MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5811/cpcem.38443

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical practice and cases in emergency medicine · 2025

Second Scope, New Findings: Pediatric Stridor Is Not Always Due to Croup or Laryngomalacia: A Case Report.

Ghaith Summer, Hsu Deborah, Dixon William

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Infantile subglottic hemangioma is a rare and serious condition characterized by stridor, respiratory distress, and a barking cough. This condition poses a significant risk as it can lead to life-threatening airway obstruction.

CASE REPORT: We present a five-week-old patient who was diagnosed in the emergency department (ED) with moderate laryngomalacia via laryngoscopy by otolaryngology and discharged; he returned to the ED the next day with worsening symptoms of recurrent stridor, difficulty feeding, and worsening respiratory distress. A second laryngoscopic exam performed on the return ED visit revealed a subglottic mass that was later identified as a left-sided subglottic hemangioma via bronchoscopy and magnetic resonance imaging. The patient was treated with propranolol and discharged from the inpatient unit with dermatology and otolaryngology follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Infantile subglottic hemangioma is a rare but serious cause of respiratory distress in infants, posing a risk of airway obstruction. This diagnosis should be considered in the ED, particularly for patients under two years of age, who present with recurrent stridor and respiratory distress and do not respond to standard treatments for croup.

Для цитирования: Ghaith Summer, Hsu Deborah, Dixon William. Second Scope, New Findings: Pediatric Stridor Is Not Always Due to Croup or Laryngomalacia: A Case Report.. Clinical practice and cases in emergency medicine. 2025. DOI: 10.5811/cpcem.38443.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.