DOI 10.1007/s00345-020-03153-8
Correlation between translabial ultrasound parameters and outcomes in retropubic mid-urethral slings: can we predict success?
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the association between four-dimensional translabial ultrasound (4D-TLUS) features of the retropubic mid-urethral sling (MUS) and post-operative pelvic floor symptoms.
METHODS
A prospective cohort study was performed involving 100 women who had a solitary retropubic MUS (TVT Exact™) between Jan 2013 and Dec 2017 for urodynamic stress incontinence (SI) at a tertiary urogynaecological centre. All patients completed a standardised interview and had free flowmetry, prolapse evaluation and assessment for mesh exposure and tenderness. 4D-TLUS parameters measured included pelvic organ descent, levator ani status, sling-symphysis pubis (SP) gap at rest and Valsalva, angle formed by cranial and caudal ends of the sling, cranio-caudal and dorso-ventral sling-symphysis pubis distance at Valsalva. The primary outcome was treatment success as defined by patient report of cure or improvement and no objective demonstrable SI.
RESULTS
Eighty-nine (89%) patients reported treatment success. Two patients (2%) had mesh exposure; one was symptomatic with pain, requiring complete sling removal. There was a significant association between treatment success and a SP gap at Valsalva of 10-12 mm (p = 0.001); and independently with a SP angle at Valsalva of 45°-80° (p = 0.007). A narrower SP gap at Valsalva closer to 10 mm was associated with voiding symptoms (p = 0.036).
CONCLUSION
Sling-pubis gap and sling-pubis angle at Valsalva appear to be significantly associated with treatment success in retropubic MUS. There is a significant association between a narrower sling-pubis gap at Valsalva and voiding symptoms.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.