MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00431-022-04463-2

Медицинская библиотека · European journal of pediatrics · 2022

Comparison of CRIB-II with SNAPPE-II for predicting survival and morbidities before hospital discharge in neonates with gestation ≤ 32 weeks: a prospective multicentric observational study.

Vardhelli Venkateshwarlu, Murki Srinivas, Tandur Baswaraj, Saha Bijan, Oleti Tejo Pratap, Deshabhotla Saikiran, Mohammed Yassar Arafat, Seth Soutrik, Siramshetty Sunayana, Kallem Venkat Reddy

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНаблюдательное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

UNLABELLED: Various studies validated and compared Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology with Perinatal extension-II (SNAPPE-II) and Clinical Risk Index for Babies-II (CRIB-II) admission sickness severity scores for predicting survival, but very few studies compared them for predicting the morbidities in preterm infants. In this multicenter prospective observational study, SNAPPE-II and CRIB-II newborn illness severity scores were compared for predicting mortality and morbidities in infants with gestational age of ≤ 32 weeks. Major morbidities were classified as bronchopulmonary dysplasia, abnormal cranial ultrasound (presence of intraventricular hemorrhage grade III or more or periventricular leukomalacia grade II to IV), and retinopathy of prematurity requiring treatment. Combined adverse outcome was defined as death or any major morbidity. Comparison of the scoring systems was done by area under the curve (AUC) on receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC curve) analysis. A total of 419 neonates who were admitted to 5 participating NICUs were studied. The mortality rate in the study population was 8.8%. Both CRIB-II (AUC: 0.795) and SNAPPE-II (AUC: 0.78) had good predictive ability for in-hospital mortality. For predicting any one of the major morbidities and combined adverse outcome, CRIB-II had better predictive ability than SNAPPE-II with AUC of 0.83 vs. 0.70 and 0.85 vs. 0.74, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In infants with gestational age of ≤ 32 weeks, both CRIB-II and SNAPPE-II are good scoring systems for predicting mortality. CRIB-II, being a simpler scoring system and having better predictive ability for major morbidities and combined adverse outcome, is preferable over SNAPPE-II.

WHAT IS KNOWN: • SNAPPE-II and CRIB-II scores have good predictive ability on in-hospital mortality in preterm neonates.

WHAT IS NEW: • SNAPPE-II and CRIB-II both have good predictive ability for mortality, but CRIB-II has better ability for short-term morbidities related to the prematurity.

Для цитирования: Vardhelli Venkateshwarlu, Murki Srinivas, Tandur Baswaraj, Saha Bijan, Oleti Tejo Pratap, Deshabhotla Saikiran, Mohammed Yassar Arafat, Seth Soutrik, Siramshetty Sunayana, Kallem Venkat Reddy. Comparison of CRIB-II with SNAPPE-II for predicting survival and morbidities before hospital discharge in neonates with gestation ≤ 32 weeks: a prospective multicentric observational study.. European journal of pediatrics. 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s00431-022-04463-2.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.