DOI 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.02.015
Reduced longitudinal excursion of the median nerve in carpal tunnel syndrome.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To determine if longitudinal excursion of the median nerve is reduced in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).
DESIGN
Case-control study.
SETTING
University human movement laboratory.
PARTICIPANTS
Nineteen patients with CTS (8 men, 11 women; mean age, 57+/-15 y), and 37 healthy controls (8 men, 29 women; mean age, 48+/-10 y).
INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Longitudinal excursion of the median nerve, and the ratio of nerve to flexor digitorum superficialis tendon excursion at the carpal tunnel evoked by finger extension. Measurements were taken using a validated Doppler ultrasound technique, and tests were conducted with the elbow positioned in extension and flexion.
RESULTS
Mean longitudinal excursion of the median nerve was significantly greater in controls (11.2+/-2.8 mm) than patients (8.3+/-2.6 mm) with the elbow extended (P=.013), but not with the elbow flexed (controls, 12.5+/-2.5 mm; patients, 10.2+/-3.1 mm; P=.089). Mean nerve/tendon excursion ratios were significantly greater in controls (.32+/-.07) than patients (.23+/-.06), with the elbow extended (P<.001), and flexed (controls, .36+/-.06; patients, .28+/-.10; P=.019). Discriminant analysis identified that 11 (58%) of the 19 patients and 3 (8%) of the 37 controls showed a nerve/tendon excursion ratio of .25 or less when tested with the elbow in extension.
CONCLUSIONS
Reduced longitudinal excursion of the median nerve at the carpal tunnel was identified in a substantial proportion of patients with CTS. Further studies are merited to determine if reduced median nerve excursion at the carpal tunnel is clinically relevant in CTS, and can be influenced by movement-based interventions.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.