MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/112067210901900528

Медицинская библиотека · European journal of ophthalmology · 2009

Determining size and characteristics of metal intraocular foreign bodies using helical CT scan.

Briscoe Daniel, Geffen Noa, Assia Ehud I, Yaffe Daniel

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To carry out a pilot study comparing the size of various types of metallic intraocular foreign bodies as imaged on computed tomographic (CT) scan to their actual size, and to determine the features of different types of metals on CT scan.

METHODS

Metallic foreign bodies of predetermined standardized sizes were prepared from iron, silver, copper, aluminium, and lead. The metallic pieces/shards were each inserted into the vitreous of a cow's eye and helical CT scan (MX twin, Picker) was performed to image the intraocular foreign bodies, using soft tissue and bone window settings. Slice section thickness was 1.3 mm, with intervals of 0.6 mm. Milliampere per second was 265 and pitch 0.7.

RESULTS

The size of all types of metals as measured on CT was larger than the actual size. Iron was enlarged by a factor of 2.29, silver 1.77, copper 1.26, and aluminum 1.17. All metals had features including central core, ring density, and artifacts which varied for each type of metal, giving each one a characteristic appearance

CONCLUSIONS

Helical CT scan could be useful in estimating the type and size of an intraocular metal foreign body made from iron, silver, copper, aluminium, or lead.

Для цитирования: Briscoe Daniel, Geffen Noa, Assia Ehud I, Yaffe Daniel. Determining size and characteristics of metal intraocular foreign bodies using helical CT scan.. European journal of ophthalmology. 2009. DOI: 10.1177/112067210901900528.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.