DOI 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2026.106674
Natural language processing to build a computable phenotype library for adults with congenital heart disease.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
Our objective was to build classifiers for multiple phenotypes that categorize a cohort of adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD), that can be used to populate variables in a biobank.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
A dataset of 1492 ACHD patients, with expert-created labels for eight phenotypes, was created and used to train classifiers with three different architectures. A larger unlabeled dataset containing 15,869 patients was used to pre-train the classifiers, and a 20 % subset of the unlabeled dataset was used to validate the classifier predictions.
RESULTS
On held out labeled data, F1 scores for the eight target phenotypes of interest ranged from 0.66 to 1. Of those, the six phenotypes with best classification performance were then validated on unlabeled data, where positive predictive value ranged from 81.5 % to 100 %.
DISCUSSION: We were able to classify six out of eight phenotypes with satisfactory performance. Challenging phenotypes included cyanosis and New York Heart Association functional class. Both vary over time and in the latter case there is limited agreement between human observers. Different phenotypes benefited from different model architectures to some degree, but the differences are small enough that uniformity of deployment may be a more important factor in choosing what models to deploy. We saw no benefit to joint training, but some phenotypes benefited from a multiclass model.
CONCLUSION
Human-curated data can be used to train text-based ACHD phenotype classifiers with promising internal performance acceptable for application in quality improvement efforts and to populate ACHD registry data.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.