Anaerobe · 2024
Clinical and microbiological characteristics of Ruminococcus gnavus bacteremia and intra-abdominal infection.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Watanabe Naoki, Watari Tomohisa, Otsuka Yoshihito, Hosokawa Naoto, Yamagata Kazufumi, Fujioka Miyuki
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Ruminococcus gnavus is a rare human pathogen, and clinical data on R. gnavus infection are insufficient. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics of R. gnavus infections.
METHODS: This study included 13 cases of bacteremia and three cases of non-bacteremia infections caused by R. gnavus. We evaluated the patient data, infection source, clinical outcomes, and antimicrobial susceptibility of R. gnavus isolates for these cases.
RESULTS: The median age of patients was 75 years (range 47-95), and eight patients were female. Twelve cases were presumed to have an intra-abdominal infection source, and the remaining four cases had an unknown infection source. The most common underlying conditions were immunosuppression (seven cases), solid tumors (seven cases), and history of gastrointestinal surgery (five cases). Thirteen patients exhibited gastrointestinal problems (dysfunction, bleeding, intra-abdominal infection, or inflammation). Multiple pathogens were observed in six cases, and fatal outcomes were recorded in three cases. Antimicrobial susceptibility data were available for eight isolates, all of which exhibited low minimum inhibitory concentrations to penicillin (≤0.03 μg/mL), ampicillin-sulbactam (≤0.5 μg/mL), piperacillin-tazobactam (≤4 μg/mL), and metronidazole (≤0.5-1 μg/mL).
CONCLUSION: Ruminococcus gnavus is frequently associated with an intra-abdominal infection source, and treatment strategies should consider the possibility of multiple pathogens.
METHODS: This study included 13 cases of bacteremia and three cases of non-bacteremia infections caused by R. gnavus. We evaluated the patient data, infection source, clinical outcomes, and antimicrobial susceptibility of R. gnavus isolates for these cases.
RESULTS: The median age of patients was 75 years (range 47-95), and eight patients were female. Twelve cases were presumed to have an intra-abdominal infection source, and the remaining four cases had an unknown infection source. The most common underlying conditions were immunosuppression (seven cases), solid tumors (seven cases), and history of gastrointestinal surgery (five cases). Thirteen patients exhibited gastrointestinal problems (dysfunction, bleeding, intra-abdominal infection, or inflammation). Multiple pathogens were observed in six cases, and fatal outcomes were recorded in three cases. Antimicrobial susceptibility data were available for eight isolates, all of which exhibited low minimum inhibitory concentrations to penicillin (≤0.03 μg/mL), ampicillin-sulbactam (≤0.5 μg/mL), piperacillin-tazobactam (≤4 μg/mL), and metronidazole (≤0.5-1 μg/mL).
CONCLUSION: Ruminococcus gnavus is frequently associated with an intra-abdominal infection source, and treatment strategies should consider the possibility of multiple pathogens.