Staged reconstruction of the severely atrophic mandible with autogenous bone graft and endosteal implants.

PURPOSE: Vastly different surgical techniques have been advocated for osseous reconstruction of the severely atrophic mandible. Endosseous implants placed in autologous bone grafts have been proposed to minimize graft resorption and restore function; however, sufficient bone must exist to support the implants and prevent pathologic fracture. The purpose of this retrospective analysis was to assess the efficacy of autologous bone grafting and the subsequent placement of endosteal implants as a staged procedure in patients with severely atrophic mandibles.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

The records of all patients presenting to The University of North Carolina for treatment from 1997 to 1999 with atrophic mandibles (vertical mandibular height <7 mm as measured on panoramic radiographs in at least 1 site at the mandibular midline and at the thinnest portion of the mandibular body) were reviewed. Bone height was assessed preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, at the time of implant placement (4 to 6 months), and again at 12 and 24 months after bone grafting from posterior iliac crest to the mandible via an extraoral approach. Five endosteal implants were subsequently placed in each patient as a delayed procedure 4 to 6 months after bone grafting, and prosthetic rehabilitation was completed with implant supported prostheses.

RESULTS

Fourteen consecutive patients were identified with a median preoperative bone height of 9 mm (interquartile range, 25th to 75th percentile [IQ], 7 to 10 mm) in the mandibular midline and 5 mm (IQ, 2 to 5 mm) in the body region. There were no perioperative complications. Median estimated blood loss during the bone graft procedure, as estimated by the surgeon and the anesthesiologist, was 300 mL (IQ, 150 to 1,100 mL), and 1 patient required blood transfusion secondary to symptomatic anemia. The mean loss of vertical bone height after grafting and during the 4 to 6 months before implant placement was 33%. After implant placement and at 12 months, the vertical bone loss was negligible in the implant-supported region and less than 11% in the body region.

CONCLUSION

Reconstruction of the severely atrophic mandible using autogenous corticocancellous bone grafts followed by placement of osseointegrated implants in 4 to 6 months can restore and maintain mandibular bone sufficient to support implants and facilitate successful restoration of occlusion. A prospective study is planned to identify predictors of successful outcomes compared with other surgical/prosthetic treatment.