Neurology · 2016
Evaluation of dysphagia by novel real-time MRI.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Olthoff Arno, Carstens Per-Ole, Zhang Shuo, von Fintel Eva, Friede Tim, Lotz Joachim, Frahm Jens, Schmidt Jens
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To assess safety and feasibility of real-time (RT) MRI for evaluation of dysphagia and to compare this technique to standard assessment by flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) and videofluoroscopy (VF) in a cohort of patients with inclusion body myositis (IBM).
METHODS: Using RT-MRI, FEES, and VF, an unselected cohort of 20 patients with IBM was studied as index disease with a uniform dysphagia. Symptoms of IBM and dysphagia were explored by standardized tools including Swallowing-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (SWAL-QoL), IBM Functional Rating Scale, Patient-Reported Functional Assessment, and Medical Research Council Scale.
RESULTS: Dysphagia was noted in 80% of the patients and SWAL-QoL was impaired in patients with IBM compared to published reference values of healthy elderly. Swallowing in a supine position during RT-MRI was well-tolerated by all patients. RT-MRI equally revealed dysphagia compared to VF and FEES and correlated well with the SWAL-QoL. Only RT-MRI allowed precise time measurements and identification of the respective tissue morphology. The pharyngeal transit times were 2-fold longer compared to published reference values and significantly correlated with morphologic abnormalities.
CONCLUSIONS: RT-MRI is safe and equally capable as VF to identify the cause of dysphagia in IBM. Advantages of RT-MRI include visualization of soft tissue, more reliable timing analysis, and lack of X-ray exposure. RT-MRI may become a routine diagnostic tool for detailed assessment of the esophagus and other moving parts of the body, facilitating longitudinal evaluations in daily practice and clinical trials.
METHODS: Using RT-MRI, FEES, and VF, an unselected cohort of 20 patients with IBM was studied as index disease with a uniform dysphagia. Symptoms of IBM and dysphagia were explored by standardized tools including Swallowing-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (SWAL-QoL), IBM Functional Rating Scale, Patient-Reported Functional Assessment, and Medical Research Council Scale.
RESULTS: Dysphagia was noted in 80% of the patients and SWAL-QoL was impaired in patients with IBM compared to published reference values of healthy elderly. Swallowing in a supine position during RT-MRI was well-tolerated by all patients. RT-MRI equally revealed dysphagia compared to VF and FEES and correlated well with the SWAL-QoL. Only RT-MRI allowed precise time measurements and identification of the respective tissue morphology. The pharyngeal transit times were 2-fold longer compared to published reference values and significantly correlated with morphologic abnormalities.
CONCLUSIONS: RT-MRI is safe and equally capable as VF to identify the cause of dysphagia in IBM. Advantages of RT-MRI include visualization of soft tissue, more reliable timing analysis, and lack of X-ray exposure. RT-MRI may become a routine diagnostic tool for detailed assessment of the esophagus and other moving parts of the body, facilitating longitudinal evaluations in daily practice and clinical trials.