MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/md.0000000000018173

Медицинская библиотека · Medicine · 2019

A rare case of stent-assisted coil embolization of coronary artery aneurysm in the left main trigeminal position: Case report.

Chen Yulin, Liu Minjie, Ren Kaihan, Wang Mingwei, Zhang Fang, Jia Dongyu

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

RATIONALE: Coronary artery aneurysms (CAAs) are uncommon in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We describe the clinical features and outcomes of stent-assisted coil embolization of a CAA in the trigeminal position.

PATIENT CONCERNS: We present a 73-year-old woman with a history of paroxysmal episodes of precordial pain since 1 year. Coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) revealed an aneurysm (diameter: 9 mm) at the junction of the distal left main coronary artery and the anterior descending branch. Troponin I, CK-MB, creatinine and routine blood investigations were within the normal range.

DIAGNOSIS: Coronary artery aneurysm in the left main trigeminal position.

INTERVENTIONS: The patient was treated with stent-assisted coil embolization.

OUTCOMES: After complete filling of the aneurysm with coil, the microcatheter was withdrawn and the stent released in the descending branch. Two stents were successfully implanted.

LESSONS: There is no clear consensus on the optimal therapy for patients with CAAs. Clinicians should be aware of the possible complications of stent-assisted coil embolization of CAA in the main trunk of the coronary artery.

Для цитирования: Chen Yulin, Liu Minjie, Ren Kaihan, Wang Mingwei, Zhang Fang, Jia Dongyu. A rare case of stent-assisted coil embolization of coronary artery aneurysm in the left main trigeminal position: Case report.. Medicine. 2019. DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000018173.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.