Cardiovascular diabetology · 2026
Comparative effects of second-line oral antidiabetic medications on atrial fibrillation risk in patients with type 2 diabetes: a nationwide retrospective cohort study.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Heo Ga Young, Heo Seok-Jae, Ko Byounghwi, Ko Ye Eun, Koh Hee Byung, Park Cheol Ho, Park Jung Tak, Han Seung Hyeok, Yoo Tae-Hyun, Kang Shin-Wook, Han Minkyung, Kim Hyung Woo
Аннотация
BACKGROUNDS: Despite numerous studies investigating the effects of antidiabetic medications on cardiovascular outcomes, the optimal second-line oral antidiabetic medication for atrial fibrillation (AF) prevention remains unclear. This study aims to compare the effects of second-line oral antidiabetic medications including sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, thiazolidinediones, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, or sulfonylureas, on the risk of incident AF in patients with type 2 diabetes.
METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed data from the National Health Insurance Service data on adults with type 2 diabetes who simultaneously initiated metformin and second-line oral antidiabetic medication (SGLT2 inhibitors, thiazolidinediones, DPP-4 inhibitors, or sulfonylureas) between September 2014 and December 2017. Exact matching by sex and age categories was conducted in a 1:1:5:5 ratio corresponding to SGLT2 inhibitor, thiazolidinedione, DPP-4 inhibitor, and sulfonylurea users, with inverse probability of treatment weighting used to balance the baseline characteristics. The primary outcome was incident AF, which was analyzed using a Fine-Gray model treating all-cause mortality as a competing risk.
RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 6.2 years, 774 cases of AF occurred among the 36,744 participants (mean age 55.3 years; 33.6% female). Compared with SGLT2 inhibitors, the risk of AF was significantly higher in patients using thiazolidinediones (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-1.36), DPP-4 inhibitor (SHR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.02-1.28), and sulfonylureas (SHR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.07-1.34). However, pairwise comparisons among thiazolidinediones, DPP-4 inhibitors, and sulfonylureas revealed no significant differences in AF risk. Subgroup analyses revealed significant effect modifications according to age, hypertension status, and renal function.
CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that SGLT2 inhibitor use was associated with a significantly lower risk of AF than use of thiazolidinediones, DPP-4 inhibitors, and sulfonylureas.
METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed data from the National Health Insurance Service data on adults with type 2 diabetes who simultaneously initiated metformin and second-line oral antidiabetic medication (SGLT2 inhibitors, thiazolidinediones, DPP-4 inhibitors, or sulfonylureas) between September 2014 and December 2017. Exact matching by sex and age categories was conducted in a 1:1:5:5 ratio corresponding to SGLT2 inhibitor, thiazolidinedione, DPP-4 inhibitor, and sulfonylurea users, with inverse probability of treatment weighting used to balance the baseline characteristics. The primary outcome was incident AF, which was analyzed using a Fine-Gray model treating all-cause mortality as a competing risk.
RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 6.2 years, 774 cases of AF occurred among the 36,744 participants (mean age 55.3 years; 33.6% female). Compared with SGLT2 inhibitors, the risk of AF was significantly higher in patients using thiazolidinediones (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-1.36), DPP-4 inhibitor (SHR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.02-1.28), and sulfonylureas (SHR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.07-1.34). However, pairwise comparisons among thiazolidinediones, DPP-4 inhibitors, and sulfonylureas revealed no significant differences in AF risk. Subgroup analyses revealed significant effect modifications according to age, hypertension status, and renal function.
CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that SGLT2 inhibitor use was associated with a significantly lower risk of AF than use of thiazolidinediones, DPP-4 inhibitors, and sulfonylureas.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
HumansRetrospective StudiesFemaleDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Middle AgedAtrial FibrillationMaleAgedRisk FactorsAdministration, OralDipeptidyl-Peptidase IV InhibitorsRisk AssessmentDatabases, FactualHypoglycemic AgentsSulfonylurea CompoundsTreatment OutcomeIncidenceTime FactorsSodium-Glucose Transporter 2 InhibitorsPPAR-gamma AgonistsInsulin SecretagoguesTaiwanThiazolidinedionesAdult