MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/ju.0000000000001075

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of urology · 2020

Current Management of Extraperitoneal Bladder Injuries: Results from the Multi-Institutional Genito-Urinary Trauma Study (MiGUTS).

Anderson Ross E, Keihani Sorena, Moses Rachel A, Nocera Alexander P, Selph J Patrick, Castillejo Becerra Clara M, Baradaran Nima, Glavin Katie, Broghammer Joshua A, Arya Chirag S, Sensenig Rachel L, Rezaee Michael E, Morris Bradley J, Majercik Sarah, Hewitt Timothy, Burks Frank N, Schwartz Ian, Elliott Sean P, Luo-Owen Xian, Mukherjee Kaushik, Thomsen Peter B, Erickson Bradley A, Miller Brandi D, Santucci Richard A, Allen LaDonna, Norwood Scott, Fick Cameron N, Smith Brian P, Piotrowski Joshua, Dodgion Christopher M, DeSoucy Erik S, Zakaluzny Scott, Kim Dennis Y, Breyer Benjamin N, Okafor Barbara U, Askari Reza, Lucas Jacob W, Simhan Jay, Khabiri Seyyed Saeed, Nirula Raminder, Myers Jeremy B

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: We studied the current management trends for extraperitoneal bladder injuries and evaluated the use of operative repair versus catheter drainage, and the associated complications with each approach.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

We prospectively collected data on bladder trauma from 20 level 1 trauma centers across the United States from 2013 to 2018. We excluded patients with intraperitoneal bladder injury and those who died within 24 hours of hospital arrival. We separated patients with extraperitoneal bladder injuries into 2 groups (catheter drainage vs operative repair) based on their initial management within the first 4 days and compared the rates of bladder injury related complications among them. Regression analyses were used to identify potential predictors of complications.

RESULTS

From 323 bladder injuries we included 157 patients with extraperitoneal bladder injuries. Concomitant injuries occurred in 139 (88%) patients with pelvic fracture seen in 79%. Sixty-seven patients (43%) initially underwent operative repair for their extraperitoneal bladder injuries. The 3 most common reasons for operative repair were severity of injury or bladder neck injury (40%), injury found during laparotomy (39%) and concern for pelvic hardware contamination (28%). Significant complications were identified in 23% and 19% of the catheter drainage and operative repair groups, respectively (p=0.55). The only statistically significant predictor for complications was bladder neck or urethral injury (RR 2.69, 95% 1.21-5.97, p=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In this large multi-institutional cohort, 43% of patients underwent surgical repair for initial management of extraperitoneal bladder injuries. We found no significant difference in complications between the initial management strategies of catheter drainage and operative repair. The most significant predictor for complications was concomitant urethral or bladder neck injury.

Для цитирования: Anderson Ross E, Keihani Sorena, Moses Rachel A, Nocera Alexander P, Selph J Patrick, Castillejo Becerra Clara M, Baradaran Nima, Glavin Katie, Broghammer Joshua A, Arya Chirag S, Sensenig Rachel L, Rezaee Michael E, Morris Bradley J, Majercik Sarah, Hewitt Timothy, Burks Frank N, Schwartz Ian, Elliott Sean P, Luo-Owen Xian, Mukherjee Kaushik, Thomsen Peter B, Erickson Bradley A, Miller Brandi D, Santucci Richard A, Allen LaDonna, Norwood Scott, Fick Cameron N, Smith Brian P, Piotrowski Joshua, Dodgion Christopher M, DeSoucy Erik S, Zakaluzny Scott, Kim Dennis Y, Breyer Benjamin N, Okafor Barbara U, Askari Reza, Lucas Jacob W, Simhan Jay, Khabiri Seyyed Saeed, Nirula Raminder, Myers Jeremy B. Current Management of Extraperitoneal Bladder Injuries: Results from the Multi-Institutional Genito-Urinary Trauma Study (MiGUTS).. The Journal of urology. 2020. DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000001075.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.