MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s13256-026-06534-6

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of medical case reports · 2026

Single and multiple oral giant cell fibromas: a case report and review of the literature.

Aziz Ghada Alaa Mohamed, Hamed Basma Ahmed, Helmy Iman Mohamed

СтатьяКлинический случайОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Giant cell fibroma (GCF), a benign fibrous growth, accounts for about 4.7% of all oral benign or reactive fibrous growths. GCF commonly occurs in Caucasians, with a minor female predilection and a peak occurrence in the first three decades of life. Clinically, gingival nodules that are roughly 1 cm in diameter are commonly seen. Diagnosis relies on histopathological features, as clinical features are not sufficient on their own.

CASE PRESENTATION: Here, we report Egyptian case series of three female and two male patients with GCFs, with age range from 15 to 64 years. Three of them occurred in relatively uncommon locations (tongue and buccal mucosa). Some of the patients had esthetic concerns and others had masticatory problems. The first case was multiple, which is extremely rare. The lesions were removed surgically and depending on the histopathological features, a final diagnosis of giant cell fibroma was established.

CONCLUSIONS

It is crucial for dentists to identify GCFs due to their frequent occurrence and to consider them when making a differential diagnosis with other fibrous hyperplastic diseases of the oral cavity, not only solitary lesions but also multiple lesions.

Для цитирования: Aziz Ghada Alaa Mohamed, Hamed Basma Ahmed, Helmy Iman Mohamed. Single and multiple oral giant cell fibromas: a case report and review of the literature.. Journal of medical case reports. 2026. DOI: 10.1186/s13256-026-06534-6.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.