MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 1997

Conventional bladder wash cytology performed by four experts versus quantitative image analysis.

van der Poel H G, Boon M E, van Stratum P, Ooms E C, Wiener H, Debruyne F M, Witjes J A, Schalken J A, Murphy W M

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Bladder wash cytology provides superior results for the detection of bladder malignancies than does voided urine analysis. Image analysis systems have been developed for quantification of cytologic features. In this study, routine bladder wash cytology is compared with an automated image analysis system (QUANTICYT). We studied a random set of 100 bladder wash samples from a population of 1614 patients in follow-up after bladder cancer. Four experienced pathologists interpreted the same 100 Papanicolaou-stained slides. Cytologic and image analysis results were compared for prediction of a cystoscopic lesion, histologic abnormalities, and tumor recurrence. After application of receiver operating characteristic curves, prediction of a cystoscopic lesion by cytology and image analysis was comparable. Both the image analysis system and the cytologic examination detected all of the high-grade lesions. Image analysis was superior to cytologic analysis for the prediction of tumor recurrence after normal findings at cystoscopic examination.

Для цитирования: van der Poel H G, Boon M E, van Stratum P, Ooms E C, Wiener H, Debruyne F M, Witjes J A, Schalken J A, Murphy W M. Conventional bladder wash cytology performed by four experts versus quantitative image analysis.. Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc. 1997.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.