MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2013.04.023

Медицинская библиотека · Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease · 2013

The role of procalcitonin in the identification of invasive fungal infection-a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Dou Yu-Hong, Du Ji-Kun, Liu He-Lu, Shong Xiao-Dong

СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

We aimed to summarize evidence on the accuracy of procalcitonin (PCT) test in differentiating fungal infection from other causes of infection. We searched electronic database for original researches that reported diagnostic performance of PCT alone or compare with other biomarkers to diagnose invasive fungal infection (IFI). We included 8 qualifying studies studying 474 episodes of suspected fungal infection with 155 (32.7%) probable or proven IFIs. Four studies compared IFI to bacterial sepsis, in which the pooled positive likelihood ratios and negative likelihood ratios were 4.65 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.46-8.79) and 0.15 (95% CI, 0.05-0.41), respectively. Another 4 studies compared IFI to uninfected individuals, in which the pooled positive likelihood ratios and negative likelihood ratios were 4.01 (95% CI, 2.04-7.88) and 0.23 (0.07-0.77), respectively. The existing literature suggests good diagnostic accuracy for the PCT test for discrimination between IFIs and bacterial infection or noninfectious conditions. Given the high heterogeneity, medical decisions should be based on both PCT test results and clinical findings.

Для цитирования: Dou Yu-Hong, Du Ji-Kun, Liu He-Lu, Shong Xiao-Dong. The role of procalcitonin in the identification of invasive fungal infection-a systemic review and meta-analysis.. Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2013.04.023.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.