MedElevator
Войти в исследования International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology · 2025
Stented and non-stented endoscopic techniques in bilateral choanal atresia repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chowdhury Raisa, Almutawa Deema, Almutairi Nasser K, Orishchak Ostap, Almhanedi Hamad, Tewfik Marc A, Daniel Sam J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Bilateral choanal atresia is a rare congenital obstruction of the posterior nasal apertures that causes severe respiratory distress and feeding difficulties in neonates and infants. While endoscopic surgical repair is the standard of care, the use of postoperative nasal stents remains controversial due to potential complications.
OBJECTIVES: This systematic review and meta-analysis compared outcomes of stented versus non-stented endoscopic approaches in bilateral choanal atresia to evaluate efficacy and safety for pediatric clinical decision-making.
METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive librarian-assisted search was conducted across PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science up to December 2024. Studies comparing stented and non-stented endoscopic repairs in pediatric or neonatal populations were included. Two reviewers independently performed data extraction and quality assessment using ROB 2 for randomized trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies.
RESULTS: Nine studies involving 336 patients for restenosis and 295 for granulation tissue analysis were included. Most patients were neonates or young infants (age range: 3-28 days). Stented procedures had significantly higher rates of restenosis (RR 2.21, 95 % CI 1.53-3.18, p < 0.01) and granulation tissue formation (RR 1.95, 95 % CI 1.31-2.90, p < 0.01). No significant differences were found in surgical success (RR 0.63, p = 0.05), bleeding (RR 0.26, p = 0.14), or polyp formation (RR 1.25, p = 0.79). Heterogeneity and publication bias were low.
CONCLUSIONS: Stenting after endoscopic repair of bilateral choanal atresia increases restenosis and granulation risks without clear benefit in surgical success or complication reduction. Routine stenting may not be warranted in neonates and infants.
OBJECTIVES: This systematic review and meta-analysis compared outcomes of stented versus non-stented endoscopic approaches in bilateral choanal atresia to evaluate efficacy and safety for pediatric clinical decision-making.
METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive librarian-assisted search was conducted across PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science up to December 2024. Studies comparing stented and non-stented endoscopic repairs in pediatric or neonatal populations were included. Two reviewers independently performed data extraction and quality assessment using ROB 2 for randomized trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies.
RESULTS: Nine studies involving 336 patients for restenosis and 295 for granulation tissue analysis were included. Most patients were neonates or young infants (age range: 3-28 days). Stented procedures had significantly higher rates of restenosis (RR 2.21, 95 % CI 1.53-3.18, p < 0.01) and granulation tissue formation (RR 1.95, 95 % CI 1.31-2.90, p < 0.01). No significant differences were found in surgical success (RR 0.63, p = 0.05), bleeding (RR 0.26, p = 0.14), or polyp formation (RR 1.25, p = 0.79). Heterogeneity and publication bias were low.
CONCLUSIONS: Stenting after endoscopic repair of bilateral choanal atresia increases restenosis and granulation risks without clear benefit in surgical success or complication reduction. Routine stenting may not be warranted in neonates and infants.