MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.7759/cureus.38588

Медицинская библиотека · Cureus · 2023

Neuroendocrine Tumor of the Ampulla of Vater: A Case Report.

Aman Mohammad S, Das Bidhan C, Islam Aminul, Arefin Murshidul, Gupta Satya N

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the ampulla of Vater are extremely rare. Here, we discuss the clinical presentation, diagnostic challenges, and treatment options of a recently experienced case of NET of the ampulla of Vater in light of the literature. A 56-year-old woman presented with recurrent upper abdominal pain. Ultrasonography (USG) of the whole abdomen showed multiple gallstones along with a dilated common bile duct (CBD). For evaluating the dilated CBD, a magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography was performed, which revealed the double-duct sign. Subsequently, an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy showed a bulged-out ampulla of the Vater. Biopsy and histopathological examination of the growth yielded the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma. A Whipple procedure was performed. Macroscopically, a 2 cm growth was noted involving the ampulla of Vater, and microscopic findings were consistent with a well-differentiated NET, grade 1 (low grade). The diagnosis was further confirmed by immunohistochemical staining (pan-cytokeratin positive, synaptophysin positive, and focally chromogranin positive). Her postoperative course was uneventful except for delayed gastric emptying. A detailed evaluation and a high index of suspicion are required for the diagnosis of this rare tumor. Treatment is relatively easier after a proper diagnosis.

Для цитирования: Aman Mohammad S, Das Bidhan C, Islam Aminul, Arefin Murshidul, Gupta Satya N. Neuroendocrine Tumor of the Ampulla of Vater: A Case Report.. Cureus. 2023. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.38588.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.