European radiology · 2022
Deep learning-based acceleration of Compressed Sense MR imaging of the ankle.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Foreman Sarah C, Neumann Jan, Han Jessie, Harrasser Norbert, Weiss Kilian, Peeters Johannes M, Karampinos Dimitrios C, Makowski Marcus R, Gersing Alexandra S, Woertler Klaus
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a compressed sensing artificial intelligence framework (CSAI) to accelerate MRI acquisition of the ankle.
METHODS: Thirty patients were scanned at 3T. Axial T2-w, coronal T1-w, and coronal/sagittal intermediate-w scans with fat saturation were acquired using compressed sensing only (12:44 min, CS), CSAI with an acceleration factor of 4.6-5.3 (6:45 min, CSAI2x), and CSAI with an acceleration factor of 6.9-7.7 (4:46 min, CSAI3x). Moreover, a high-resolution axial T2-w scan was obtained using CSAI with a similar scan duration compared to CS. Depiction and presence of abnormalities were graded. Signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise were calculated. Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Cohen's kappa were used to compare CSAI with CS sequences.
RESULTS: The correlation was perfect between CS and CSAI2x (κ = 1.0) and excellent for CS and CSAI3x (κ = 0.86-1.0). No significant differences were found for the depiction of structures between CS and CSAI2x and the same abnormalities were detected in both protocols. For CSAI3x the depiction was graded lower (p ≤ 0.001), though most abnormalities were also detected. For CSAI2x contrast-to-noise fluid/muscle was higher compared to CS (p ≤ 0.05), while no differences were found for other tissues. Signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise were higher for CSAI3x compared to CS (p ≤ 0.05). The high - resolution axial T2-w sequence specifically improved the depiction of tendons and the tibial nerve (p ≤ 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: Acquisition times can be reduced by 47% using CSAI compared to CS without decreasing diagnostic image quality. Reducing acquisition times by 63% is feasible but should be reserved for specific patients. The depiction of specific structures is improved using a high-resolution axial T2-w CSAI scan.
KEY POINTS: • Prospective study showed that CSAI enables reduction in acquisition times by 47% without decreasing diagnostic image quality. • Reducing acquisition times by 63% still produces images with an acceptable diagnostic accuracy but should be reserved for specific patients. • CSAI may be implemented to scan at a higher resolution compared to standard CS images without increasing acquisition times.
METHODS: Thirty patients were scanned at 3T. Axial T2-w, coronal T1-w, and coronal/sagittal intermediate-w scans with fat saturation were acquired using compressed sensing only (12:44 min, CS), CSAI with an acceleration factor of 4.6-5.3 (6:45 min, CSAI2x), and CSAI with an acceleration factor of 6.9-7.7 (4:46 min, CSAI3x). Moreover, a high-resolution axial T2-w scan was obtained using CSAI with a similar scan duration compared to CS. Depiction and presence of abnormalities were graded. Signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise were calculated. Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Cohen's kappa were used to compare CSAI with CS sequences.
RESULTS: The correlation was perfect between CS and CSAI2x (κ = 1.0) and excellent for CS and CSAI3x (κ = 0.86-1.0). No significant differences were found for the depiction of structures between CS and CSAI2x and the same abnormalities were detected in both protocols. For CSAI3x the depiction was graded lower (p ≤ 0.001), though most abnormalities were also detected. For CSAI2x contrast-to-noise fluid/muscle was higher compared to CS (p ≤ 0.05), while no differences were found for other tissues. Signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise were higher for CSAI3x compared to CS (p ≤ 0.05). The high - resolution axial T2-w sequence specifically improved the depiction of tendons and the tibial nerve (p ≤ 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: Acquisition times can be reduced by 47% using CSAI compared to CS without decreasing diagnostic image quality. Reducing acquisition times by 63% is feasible but should be reserved for specific patients. The depiction of specific structures is improved using a high-resolution axial T2-w CSAI scan.
KEY POINTS: • Prospective study showed that CSAI enables reduction in acquisition times by 47% without decreasing diagnostic image quality. • Reducing acquisition times by 63% still produces images with an acceptable diagnostic accuracy but should be reserved for specific patients. • CSAI may be implemented to scan at a higher resolution compared to standard CS images without increasing acquisition times.