Human genomics · 2026
Beckwith-Wiedemann spectrum exhibiting a 46,XY karyotype caused by genome-wide paternal uniparental heterodisomy: a case report.
СтатьяКлинический случайНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hara Satoshi, Sato Tomohiko, Shimokawa Osamu, Pooh Ritsuko, Watanabe Yayoi, Kubiura-Ichimaru Musashi, Soejima Hidenobu
Аннотация
BACKGROUNDS: Patients with genome-wide paternal uniparental disomy (GWpUPD) usually exhibit clinical features of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS) and a 46,XX karyotype, with all chromosomes showing isodisomy. To date, male patients with GWpUPD and a complete 46,XY karyotype, specifically involving heterodisomy, have not been described.
RESULTS: We report a male infant exhibiting classical BWS clinical features. DNA methylation analyses showed paternal-specific methylation across multiple imprinted loci, suggesting GWpUPD. Genetic analysis of autosomes and sex chromosomes indicated two distinct paternal genomes in peripheral blood leukocytes, whereas a normal biparental genome was detected in other tissues under chimeric conditions. These findings indicated that the patient had genome-wide paternal uniparental heterodisomy (GWpUPhD). The SNP array revealed the presence of one copy of the X chromosome and one copy of the Y chromosome, the patient is a chimera composed of 46,XY biparental cells (with maternal X) and 46,XY GWpUPhD cells (with paternal X).
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of a male patient with a GWpUPhD chimera. We propose a potential mechanism of GWpUPhD formation. Our findings expand the molecular spectrum of GWpUPD and provide valuable insights into its pathogenesis in chimeric conditions. Furthermore, the potential for clinical manifestations unique to 46,XY heterodisomy warrants careful long-term follow-up.
RESULTS: We report a male infant exhibiting classical BWS clinical features. DNA methylation analyses showed paternal-specific methylation across multiple imprinted loci, suggesting GWpUPD. Genetic analysis of autosomes and sex chromosomes indicated two distinct paternal genomes in peripheral blood leukocytes, whereas a normal biparental genome was detected in other tissues under chimeric conditions. These findings indicated that the patient had genome-wide paternal uniparental heterodisomy (GWpUPhD). The SNP array revealed the presence of one copy of the X chromosome and one copy of the Y chromosome, the patient is a chimera composed of 46,XY biparental cells (with maternal X) and 46,XY GWpUPhD cells (with paternal X).
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of a male patient with a GWpUPhD chimera. We propose a potential mechanism of GWpUPhD formation. Our findings expand the molecular spectrum of GWpUPD and provide valuable insights into its pathogenesis in chimeric conditions. Furthermore, the potential for clinical manifestations unique to 46,XY heterodisomy warrants careful long-term follow-up.