MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2147/imcrj.s425424

Медицинская библиотека · International medical case reports journal · 2023

Uterocolon Fistula Formation in 50 Year Old Patient with History of 16 Years Intrauterine Device Use: A Case Report.

Gurnita Adiguna Wibawa, Achmad Eppy Darmadi

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Uterocolon fistula is one of the complications of intrauterine device (IUD) insertion. Not only may IUD materials cause perforation, but some other risk factors may contribute to its development including uterine abnormalities, thus IUD is contraindicated in patients with anatomical anomaly.

CASE: P3A1 woman, 50 years old with a history of IUD use for 16 years presented with complaints of fecal discharge from the vagina 8 months ago which worsened after IUD extraction. Physical examination revealed no abdominal tenderness. Speculum examination found feces in the cervical canal. CT scan examination showed multiple uterocolon fistulas and uterine didelphys. Diagnostic laparoscopy and hysteroscopy were carried out and found a recto-uterine fistula, then the patient was scheduled for colostomy and reanastomosis with the stapler method.

CONCLUSION

Diagnosis was very difficult to establish despite proper imaging modalities. The use of direct visual diagnostics (hysteroscopy and laparoscopy) can be a good alternative for the diagnosis of uterocolon fistula. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report on recto-uterine fistula in a patient with long-term use of IUD and uterine didelphys.

Для цитирования: Gurnita Adiguna Wibawa, Achmad Eppy Darmadi. Uterocolon Fistula Formation in 50 Year Old Patient with History of 16 Years Intrauterine Device Use: A Case Report.. International medical case reports journal. 2023. DOI: 10.2147/imcrj.s425424.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.