MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00330-010-1933-1

Медицинская библиотека · European radiology · 2010

CT colonography and transient bacteraemia: implications for antibiotic prophylaxis.

Ridge C A, Carter M R, Browne L P, Ryan R, Hegarty C, Schaffer K, Malone D E

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To determine the prevalence of transient bacteraemia after CT colonography (CTC).

METHODS

Blood cultures were obtained at 5, 10 and 15 min after CTC from 100 consecutive consenting patients. Blood samples were cultured in both aerobic and anaerobic media and positive blood culture samples were analysed by a microbiologist.

RESULTS

Blood culture samples were positive for growth in sixteen patients. All positive blood culture samples were confirmed skin contaminants. There were no cases of significant bacteraemia. The estimated significant bacteraemia rate as a result of CTC is 0-3.7%, based on 95% confidence intervals around extreme results using Wilson's score method.

CONCLUSIONS

American Heart Association and National Institute for Clinical Excellence guidelines advise that antibiotic prophylaxis before lower gastrointestinal endoscopy is not indicated in patients with at risk cardiac lesions (ARCL) as the risk of a transient bacteraemia leading to infective endocarditis is low. These data show that the prevalence of transient bacteraemia after CTC is also low. It follows that patients with ARCL do not require antibiotic prophylaxis before CTC.

Для цитирования: Ridge C A, Carter M R, Browne L P, Ryan R, Hegarty C, Schaffer K, Malone D E. CT colonography and transient bacteraemia: implications for antibiotic prophylaxis.. European radiology. 2010. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-1933-1.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.