MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1089/cren.2017.0126

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of endourology case reports · 2017

Wandering Double-J Stent in the Retroperitoneum: A Case Report.

Panaiyadiyan Sridhar, Shukla Abhishek, Nayak Brusabhanu, Singh Prabhjot, Saini Ashish Kumar

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Background

Double-J (DJ) stent is an integral part of urologic practice. DJ stents can have numerous complications such as persistent irritative symptoms, encrustations, and up and down migrations within the pelvicaliceal system (PCS), but displacement outside the urinary tract is rare. We are presenting a unique case of DJ stent lying outside the PCS for more than a decade. Case Presentation: A 46-year-old female presented with left flank pain and dysuria. She had undergone percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the left side 11 years ago. Imaging studies revealed a forgotten DJ stent with proximal part lying in the PCS with dense encrustations and the distal coil in the retroperitoneum at the level of the contralateral sacroiliac joint with the shaft crossing the midline at fourth lumbar vertebral level. The malpositioned forgotten stent was removed intact using the multimodal endourologic technique. During follow-up, the patient had prompt relief of symptoms and a preserved renal unit.

Conclusion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of malpositioned and forgotten DJ stent for more than a decade with lower end lying near the opposite lower ureter managed effectively by an endourologic method.

Для цитирования: Panaiyadiyan Sridhar, Shukla Abhishek, Nayak Brusabhanu, Singh Prabhjot, Saini Ashish Kumar. Wandering Double-J Stent in the Retroperitoneum: A Case Report.. Journal of endourology case reports. 2017. DOI: 10.1089/cren.2017.0126.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.