The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians · 2020
Percutaneous nephrostomy placement in pregnant patients: a retrospective single center experience.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Epelboym Yan, Tivnan Patrick, Desai Khanant, O'Horo Susan
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Literature on percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) placement in pregnant patients is limited. The purpose of this case series of 20 pregnant patients was to report short term maternal and fetal outcomes in this population.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 12-year retrospective study was performed on pregnant patients undergoing PCN. Clinical indications, technical success, maternal outcome, fetal outcome, and complications were obtained from the electronic medical record.
RESULTS: Indications for PCN placement included urolithiasis (40%), congenital ureteral dysfunction in the setting of prior ureteral repair (30%), obstruction associated pain (15%), infection (10%), and ureteral injury in the setting of surgery for ovarian torsion (5%). Catheter insertion was successful in all patients (n = 20), with one major complication (urosepsis). Follow up data was available in 19 patients (95%). Catheters were in situ for a median of 82 days. All patients had clinical and symptomatic improvement. Emergency C-sections were required in two cases. Radiation exposure data were available in 15 of 19 patients and revealed a median fluoroscopy time of 2.8 min, median cumulative dose of 43 mGy, and median dose area product of 635 µGy × m2. No adverse fetal outcomes were recorded at time of delivery.
CONCLUSION: PCN placement has good clinical results as a treatment option for ureteral obstruction in a pregnant cohort.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 12-year retrospective study was performed on pregnant patients undergoing PCN. Clinical indications, technical success, maternal outcome, fetal outcome, and complications were obtained from the electronic medical record.
RESULTS: Indications for PCN placement included urolithiasis (40%), congenital ureteral dysfunction in the setting of prior ureteral repair (30%), obstruction associated pain (15%), infection (10%), and ureteral injury in the setting of surgery for ovarian torsion (5%). Catheter insertion was successful in all patients (n = 20), with one major complication (urosepsis). Follow up data was available in 19 patients (95%). Catheters were in situ for a median of 82 days. All patients had clinical and symptomatic improvement. Emergency C-sections were required in two cases. Radiation exposure data were available in 15 of 19 patients and revealed a median fluoroscopy time of 2.8 min, median cumulative dose of 43 mGy, and median dose area product of 635 µGy × m2. No adverse fetal outcomes were recorded at time of delivery.
CONCLUSION: PCN placement has good clinical results as a treatment option for ureteral obstruction in a pregnant cohort.