DOI 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.01.040
Abnormal findings in hallucal sesamoids on MR imaging-Associated with different pathologies of the forefoot? An observational study.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
To evaluate the prevalence and localization of abnormalities in the hallucal sesamoids detectable by magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in patients with forefoot pain and to determine which pathologies of tarsus, metatarsus and phalanges are associated with these abnormalities.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
The forefoot MRI examinations of 50 consecutive patients (32 females, 18 males; mean age 51 years, age range 20-86 years) were retrospectively analyzed by two musculoskeletal radiologists. A minimum of coronal and sagittal T1-weighted images and STIR images or T2-weighted images with fat saturation were performed on a 1.5-T scanner. Abnormal findings in the sesamoids were correlated with pathology in the I.MTP (metatarsal-phalangeal) joint, pathology in other parts of the forefoot and clinical information.
RESULTS
Signal abnormalities of the sesamoids were found in 7 patients out of 50 (14%). Two patients presented a bone marrow edema (BME) in both sesamoids, in 1 patient only the lateral one was affected; all three associated with pathology and pain in the I.MTP joint. In four patients only the medial sesamoid was affected, not associated with pathology in the I.MTP joint but with pathology in other parts of the forefoot.
CONCLUSION
The prevalence of signal abnormalities in hallucal sesamoids was 14%. BME of the lateral sesamoid or of both were predominantly associated with pathology in the I.MTP joint. In contrast, signal abnormalities of the medial sesamoid, without affection of the lateral one, were associated with pathology in other parts of the forefoot suggesting an overuse injury as a result of compensating posture.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.