Journal of tissue viability · 2026
Risk factors for facial pressure injuries in adults receiving non-invasive positive pressure ventilation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Duan Xuemei, Fan Liping, Deng Liangjing, Mao Wei
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify risk factors for facial pressure injuries.
METHODS: The study adhered to the PRISMA reporting guidelines and conducted a comprehensive search across nine databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, OVID, Embase, Chinese Biomedical Database, China Knowledge Resource Integrated Database, Wanfang Database, and Weipu Database, to identify the risk factors for facial pressure injuries. Observational studies investigating these risk factors were included, with data collection up to April 15, 2026, for database construction. The quality of the literature was assessed using the 2016 edition of the Australian Joanna Briggs Institute Centre for Evidence-Based Health Care Evaluation Criteria and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
RESULTS: 19 studies involving 4119 samples were included. The findings indicated that the overall prevalence of facial pressure injuries was 32%. Ten factors associated with the development of facial pressure injuries included non-invasive ventilation protocol, fever, cumulative duration of non-invasive ventilation, the use of vasoactive drugs, PCO2 ≥ 50 mmHg, diabetes, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score, Glasgow coma scale, albumin levels, and age.
CONCLUSIONS: Comprehending the risk factors linked to facial pressure injuries can facilitate the early identification of high-risk individuals and mitigate the occurrence of such injuries.
METHODS: The study adhered to the PRISMA reporting guidelines and conducted a comprehensive search across nine databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, OVID, Embase, Chinese Biomedical Database, China Knowledge Resource Integrated Database, Wanfang Database, and Weipu Database, to identify the risk factors for facial pressure injuries. Observational studies investigating these risk factors were included, with data collection up to April 15, 2026, for database construction. The quality of the literature was assessed using the 2016 edition of the Australian Joanna Briggs Institute Centre for Evidence-Based Health Care Evaluation Criteria and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
RESULTS: 19 studies involving 4119 samples were included. The findings indicated that the overall prevalence of facial pressure injuries was 32%. Ten factors associated with the development of facial pressure injuries included non-invasive ventilation protocol, fever, cumulative duration of non-invasive ventilation, the use of vasoactive drugs, PCO2 ≥ 50 mmHg, diabetes, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score, Glasgow coma scale, albumin levels, and age.
CONCLUSIONS: Comprehending the risk factors linked to facial pressure injuries can facilitate the early identification of high-risk individuals and mitigate the occurrence of such injuries.