MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00125-026-06812-4

Медицинская библиотека · Diabetologia · 2026

A narrative review of what cohorts have taught us and how they have laid the foundation for much of our understanding of type 2 diabetes.

Kim Sun H, Arora Ipsa, Agyemang Charles, Anjana Ranjit M, Åsvold Bjørn Olav, Blom Marieke, Bhupathiraju Shilpa N, Bonnefond Amélie, Chan Juliana C N, Davis Timothy M E, Hveem Kristian, Jørgensen Marit E, Lager Anton, Lind Lars, Melander Olle, Natali Andrea, Price Jackie, Raina Parminder, Roden Michael, Rolandsson Olov, Rooney Mary R, Mousavi Seyed Mohammad, Sposito Andrei C, Thomsen Reimar W, Thorand Barbara, Van Dam Rob M, Venkataraman Kavita, Wild Sarah H, Yu Ji Hee, Elders Petra J M, Beulens Joline W, Rutters Femke

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

This narrative review provides a historical perspective on how observational research on type 2 diabetes has been developed and consolidated over the last 50 years and how well-designed cohort studies will provide us with knowledge for research and practice in the future and aid guideline development. We have included data from a large number of cohorts from every continent that have been used to study the development and/or progression of type 2 diabetes, including cohorts that are general population-based, disease-based, intervention-based and registry-based. We have structured the results from the past 50 years based on the following themes: diagnosis and screening, complications, risk factors and pathophysiology. We also discuss the strengths and weaknesses of observational research when compared with other research designs. Finally, we discuss the emerging and future directions for type 2 diabetes research using cohorts, which include novel developments, such as artificial intelligence, precision health and the exposome. We conclude that cohort research has significantly advanced our understanding of type 2 diabetes and aided guideline development, and complements experimental work, such as human randomised controlled trials and animal studies. Both approaches are essential and complementary in our pursuit to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the development and progression of type 2 diabetes, and to change dogma, practice and policies for better outcomes.

Для цитирования: Kim Sun H, Arora Ipsa, Agyemang Charles, Anjana Ranjit M, Åsvold Bjørn Olav, Blom Marieke, Bhupathiraju Shilpa N, Bonnefond Amélie, Chan Juliana C N, Davis Timothy M E, Hveem Kristian, Jørgensen Marit E, Lager Anton, Lind Lars, Melander Olle, Natali Andrea, Price Jackie, Raina Parminder, Roden Michael, Rolandsson Olov, Rooney Mary R, Mousavi Seyed Mohammad, Sposito Andrei C, Thomsen Reimar W, Thorand Barbara, Van Dam Rob M, Venkataraman Kavita, Wild Sarah H, Yu Ji Hee, Elders Petra J M, Beulens Joline W, Rutters Femke. A narrative review of what cohorts have taught us and how they have laid the foundation for much of our understanding of type 2 diabetes.. Diabetologia. 2026. DOI: 10.1007/s00125-026-06812-4.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.