MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.25259/sni_41_2025

Медицинская библиотека · Surgical neurology international · 2026

Pygopagus conjoined twins: A case report and neurosurgical nuances in separation surgery.

Tomaszeski Rafael Harter, Ribeiro Luiza, Abdon Lilian Carine Souza de Lima, Perondi Gerson Evandro, Dos Santos Samir Cezimbra

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Conjoined twins are univitelline, monochorionic, and monoamniotic, with imperfect division. The estimated worldwide prevalence is 1.47/100,000 births, with approximately 50% resulting in live births. They are classified according to the most prominent site of fusion. Pygopagus twins are joined at the sacral region and are the third most common variation, representing 6-19% of conjoined twins. Pygopagus twins may have a fused spinal canal and spinal cord, presenting a neurosurgical challenge during separation surgery.

CASE DESCRIPTION: We report the case of conjoined twins diagnosed prenatally by ultrasound, who, on radiological investigation after birth, were identified as pygopagus twins with fusion of the lumbosacral vertebral canal and a "U"-shaped spinal union. They underwent successful separation surgery using neuromonitoring.

CONCLUSION

Pygopagus twins with a fused spinal canal and spinal cord are a neurosurgical challenge during separation surgery. It is a rare condition; therefore, meticulous planning is essential for a good prognosis.

Для цитирования: Tomaszeski Rafael Harter, Ribeiro Luiza, Abdon Lilian Carine Souza de Lima, Perondi Gerson Evandro, Dos Santos Samir Cezimbra. Pygopagus conjoined twins: A case report and neurosurgical nuances in separation surgery.. Surgical neurology international. 2026. DOI: 10.25259/sni_41_2025.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.