MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/bjs.4057

Медицинская библиотека · The British journal of surgery · 2003

Prospective randomized study of bacteraemia in diathermy and stapled haemorrhoidectomy.

Maw A, Concepcion R, Eu K W, Seow-Choen F, Heah S M, Tang C L, Tan A L

Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The incidence and consequences of bacteraemia associated with diathermy and stapled haemorrhoidectomy have not been studied previously.

METHODS

Two hundred and five healthy patients randomized to stapled haemorrhoidectomy or diathermy haemorrhoidectomy had perioperative blood cultures taken. The clinical sequelae of bacteraemia and complications of surgery were assessed prospectively.

RESULTS

Six patients were excluded for protocol violations. Eleven (11 per cent) of 101 patients with stapled and five (5 per cent) of 98 who had diathermy haemorrhoidectomy had positive blood cultures for organisms after haemorrhoidectomy, predominantly anaerobes commonly found within the bacterial flora of the anorectum (P = 0.19). Transient postoperative pyrexia in several patients did not correlate with detected bacteraemia and settled spontaneously without treatment. There were no serious complications from either operative technique, and no clinical consequences from proven bacteraemia.

CONCLUSION

Transient bacteraemia may complicate surgical haemorrhoidectomy but has no serious clinical consequences for healthy adults.

Для цитирования: Maw A, Concepcion R, Eu K W, Seow-Choen F, Heah S M, Tang C L, Tan A L. Prospective randomized study of bacteraemia in diathermy and stapled haemorrhoidectomy.. The British journal of surgery. 2003. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.4057.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.