Heart rhythm O2 · 2026
Vascular closure devices in electrophysiology procedures: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Knijnik Leonardo M, Rao Birju R, Kiani Soroosh, DeLurgio David B, Lloyd Michael S
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Vascular closure devices (VCDs) have been shown to reduce the time to hemostasis in single-point arterial access sites, but their benefit in electrophysiology (EP) procedures requiring multipoint venous access remains uncertain.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the efficacy and safety of VCDs compared with manual compression or figure-of-8 suture for venous hemostasis after EP procedures.
METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar was conducted in June 2025 to identify randomized controlled trials comparing VCDs with manual or figure-of-8 closure in EP procedures.
RESULTS: 6 randomized controlled trials including 848 patients (460 treated with VCDs) were analyzed. VCDs significantly reduced hematoma formation (3.4% vs 7.7%; odds ratio, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-0.92; P = .03) and a composite outcome of all vascular complications (10.4% vs 17.2%; odds ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.50-0.98; P = .04). Times to hemostasis, ambulation, and disposition were significantly shorter in the VCD group by 5.5, 129, and 84 minutes, respectively.
CONCLUSION: VCDs modestly reduce vascular complications and significantly shorten recovery time after EP procedures.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the efficacy and safety of VCDs compared with manual compression or figure-of-8 suture for venous hemostasis after EP procedures.
METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar was conducted in June 2025 to identify randomized controlled trials comparing VCDs with manual or figure-of-8 closure in EP procedures.
RESULTS: 6 randomized controlled trials including 848 patients (460 treated with VCDs) were analyzed. VCDs significantly reduced hematoma formation (3.4% vs 7.7%; odds ratio, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-0.92; P = .03) and a composite outcome of all vascular complications (10.4% vs 17.2%; odds ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.50-0.98; P = .04). Times to hemostasis, ambulation, and disposition were significantly shorter in the VCD group by 5.5, 129, and 84 minutes, respectively.
CONCLUSION: VCDs modestly reduce vascular complications and significantly shorten recovery time after EP procedures.