Frontiers in microbiology · 2025
Extended spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales in live and dead birds from rural poultry farms and urban live bird markets of Bangladesh.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Amin Mohammed Badrul, Hoque Kazi Injamamul, Sraboni Ajrin Sultana, Bhuiyan Omar Faruk, Happy Tanjin Tamanna, Alam Munirul, Mondal Dinesh, Islam Mohammad Aminul
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Poultry raised with antibiotic prophylaxis are significant reservoirs of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E). Improper disposal of poultry wastes is common in developing countries, increasing the risk of spreading ESBL-E. Previous studies largely focused on ESBL-producing E. coli in poultry, overlooking other Enterobacterales and dead birds.
METHODS: Between December 2019 and June 2021, this study investigated 220 fecal samples collected from 55 freshly slaughtered and 55 dead birds in urban live bird markets and rural poultry farms in Bangladesh for detection and enumeration of ESBL-E.
RESULTS: Overall 68% (n = 150) samples were positive for ESBL-E, with a significantly higher prevalence in urban live-bird markets (88%, n = 97) than rural poultry farms (48%, n = 53; p < 0.01, OR = 7.25, 95% CI: 3.77-14.71) and slightly higher in dead (n = 81, 74%) than live birds (n = 69, 63%). ESBL-producing E. coli was most common (66%, n = 146), followed by ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (10%, n = 22), Raoultella terrigena (3%, n = 7) and Enterobacter spp. (3% n = 6). The abundance of ESBL-producing E. coli was significantly higher in urban live-bird markets than rural poultry farms (3.9 vs. 2.0 log10 CFU/g; p < 0.001, Cliff's Delta = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.40-0.65) and in dead than live birds (3.4 vs. 2.2 log10 CFU/g; p < 0.01, Cliff's Delta = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.08-0.38). The abundance of ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae, Enterobacter, and R. terrigena (1.6-1.8 log10 CFU/g) showed no significant difference between urban live-bird markets and rural poultry farms or between live and dead birds. A higher proportion of ESBL-E from urban live bird markets were resistant to 10 out of 11 antibiotic classes, compared to those from rural poultry farms (p < 0.05). Further, ESBL-E isolates from dead birds showed higher resistance to aminoglycosides, glycylcyclines, and penicillins+β-lactamase inhibitors than isolates from live birds (p < 0.05). Overall, 65% of isolates were resistant to penicillins, fluoroquinolones, and monobactams, while 2% were carbapenem-resistant. The prevalence of multi-drug resistant E. coli was higher in urban live bird markets (86%, n = 95) than rural poultry farms (45%, n = 49; p < 0.01). Among 181 ESBL-E, bla TEM (62%, n = 114) was the most prevalent, followed by bla CTX - M-group (17%, n = 32) and bla SHV (12%, n = 22).
DISCUSSION: The widespread ESBL-E in poultry underscores the urgent need for improved biosecurity and waste management across the poultry supply chain.
METHODS: Between December 2019 and June 2021, this study investigated 220 fecal samples collected from 55 freshly slaughtered and 55 dead birds in urban live bird markets and rural poultry farms in Bangladesh for detection and enumeration of ESBL-E.
RESULTS: Overall 68% (n = 150) samples were positive for ESBL-E, with a significantly higher prevalence in urban live-bird markets (88%, n = 97) than rural poultry farms (48%, n = 53; p < 0.01, OR = 7.25, 95% CI: 3.77-14.71) and slightly higher in dead (n = 81, 74%) than live birds (n = 69, 63%). ESBL-producing E. coli was most common (66%, n = 146), followed by ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (10%, n = 22), Raoultella terrigena (3%, n = 7) and Enterobacter spp. (3% n = 6). The abundance of ESBL-producing E. coli was significantly higher in urban live-bird markets than rural poultry farms (3.9 vs. 2.0 log10 CFU/g; p < 0.001, Cliff's Delta = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.40-0.65) and in dead than live birds (3.4 vs. 2.2 log10 CFU/g; p < 0.01, Cliff's Delta = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.08-0.38). The abundance of ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae, Enterobacter, and R. terrigena (1.6-1.8 log10 CFU/g) showed no significant difference between urban live-bird markets and rural poultry farms or between live and dead birds. A higher proportion of ESBL-E from urban live bird markets were resistant to 10 out of 11 antibiotic classes, compared to those from rural poultry farms (p < 0.05). Further, ESBL-E isolates from dead birds showed higher resistance to aminoglycosides, glycylcyclines, and penicillins+β-lactamase inhibitors than isolates from live birds (p < 0.05). Overall, 65% of isolates were resistant to penicillins, fluoroquinolones, and monobactams, while 2% were carbapenem-resistant. The prevalence of multi-drug resistant E. coli was higher in urban live bird markets (86%, n = 95) than rural poultry farms (45%, n = 49; p < 0.01). Among 181 ESBL-E, bla TEM (62%, n = 114) was the most prevalent, followed by bla CTX - M-group (17%, n = 32) and bla SHV (12%, n = 22).
DISCUSSION: The widespread ESBL-E in poultry underscores the urgent need for improved biosecurity and waste management across the poultry supply chain.