MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_666_24

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2025

Role of Intravenous Pyelography in the Evaluation of Developmental Renal Anomalies.

Gokul V Ganesh, Ayyadurai Saranya, Sarvesh R, Thangam Vinoth

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

AIM: This study aims to examine the role of intravenous pyelography (IVP) in the evaluation of developmental renal anomalies.

MATERIALS AND METHOD: A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted on 26 subjects presenting with loin pain and suspicion of renal anomalies, subjected to IVP at ACS Medical College and Hospital, Chennai. Descriptive statistics were used for frequency and percentage.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 61.5% males and 38.5% females, indicating a male predilection for renal anomalies. Horseshoe kidney (31%) and duplex collecting system (23%) were the most prevalent anomalies, underscoring the importance of early detection and tailored management. Less frequent anomalies included malrotation, ectopic kidney, crossed renal ectopia, and unilateral renal agenesis.

CONCLUSION

Despite advancements in imaging technology, IVP remains relevant for detailed anatomical and functional assessment of the urinary tract. This study highlights the importance of proactive management and multidisciplinary collaboration in optimizing outcomes for patients with developmental renal anomalies.

Для цитирования: Gokul V Ganesh, Ayyadurai Saranya, Sarvesh R, Thangam Vinoth. Role of Intravenous Pyelography in the Evaluation of Developmental Renal Anomalies.. Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences. 2025. DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_666_24.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.