MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3390/jcm15062383

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical medicine · 2026

Central Aortic Cannulation in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery via Right Thoracotomy: A Single-Center Retrospective Comparison.

Özdem Tayfun, Demirkıran Tuna, Akyol Mesut, Taşöz Özdaş Işıl, Akyol Furkan Burak, Tokgöz Yiğit, Özdemir Veli Can, Kubat Emre, Arslan Gökhan, Kadan Murat, Karabacak Kubilay

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Background/

Objectives

Minimally invasive cardiac surgery via right thoracotomy commonly uses femoral arterial cannulation for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), which requires an additional groin incision and may be associated with access-related complications. Central aortic cannulation through the same thoracotomy allows antegrade perfusion without an extra incision. This study compared central aortic and femoral arterial cannulation strategies in minimally invasive cardiac surgery via right thoracotomy.

Methods

This retrospective, single-center study included 139 consecutive patients undergoing minimally invasive right thoracotomy cardiac surgery with CPB between February 2021 and June 2023. Patients were grouped according to arterial cannulation strategy: central aortic cannulation (n = 93) and femoral arterial cannulation (n = 46). Demographic characteristics, operative variables, transfusion requirements, biochemical parameters, and early postoperative clinical outcomes were compared between the groups.

Results

Baseline demographic characteristics differed between groups (age, height, body surface area, and sex distribution), and these differences should be considered potential confounders when interpreting outcome comparisons. Central cannulation was more frequently used in women (74.2% vs. 45.7%, p = 0.001). Patients in the femoral group were older (median 61.0 vs. 54.0 years, p = 0.004), taller (1.65 ± 0.10 vs. 1.59 ± 0.09 m, p < 0.001), and had a slightly higher body surface area (p = 0.043). Cross-clamp and CPB durations were longer in the femoral group (cross-clamp: 90.0 vs. 70.5 min, p = 0.015; CPB: 137.0 vs. 114.0 min, p = 0.003). Lymphatic leakage occurred in three patients in the femoral group (6.5% vs. 0%, p = 0.009). No significant differences were observed between groups for mortality, intensive care unit stay, or neurological events.

Conclusions

Central aortic cannulation via right thoracotomy is a feasible alternative to femoral arterial cannulation, enabling antegrade perfusion without a groin incision, reducing operative time, and potentially decreasing access-related complications such as lymphatic leakage, while yielding comparable early clinical outcomes. These findings should be interpreted cautiously given the retrospective design and baseline differences between groups.

Для цитирования: Özdem Tayfun, Demirkıran Tuna, Akyol Mesut, Taşöz Özdaş Işıl, Akyol Furkan Burak, Tokgöz Yiğit, Özdemir Veli Can, Kubat Emre, Arslan Gökhan, Kadan Murat, Karabacak Kubilay. Central Aortic Cannulation in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery via Right Thoracotomy: A Single-Center Retrospective Comparison.. Journal of clinical medicine. 2026. DOI: 10.3390/jcm15062383.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.