MedElevator
Войти в исследования Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie · 2019
[Retrospective multicentric evaluation of the efficacy of four-arms and adjustable male slings in the management of mild and moderate urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy].
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
El Kharroubi A, Dergamoun H, Droupy S, Wagner Laurent
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Objective of the study to carry out a retrospective multicentric evaluation of the efficacy of male slings in the management of mild and moderate urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy.
METHOD: We performed a multi-center study that included all patients with mild to moderate urinary stress incontinence after radical prostatectomy with adjustable slings or four-arm slings. We collected the number of protections before the procedure and one year after the application of the male sling.
RESULTS: A 4 arms or adjustable sling was put to 65 men. The cure rate was 33.3% (n=5) for Remeex, 52% (n=13) for TOMS, and 46.7% (n=12) for Virtue (P=0.07). The failure rate was 26.7% (n=4) for Remeex, 24% (n=6) for TOMS, and 40% (n=10) for Virtue (P=0.18). The overall complication rate was 40% (n=6) for Remeex, 28% (n=7) for TOMS, and 16% (n=4) for Virtue (P=0.19).
CONCLUSION: This multicentric retrospective series confirms that male slings are a usefull therapy for patients with mild or moderate urinary incontinence.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.
METHOD: We performed a multi-center study that included all patients with mild to moderate urinary stress incontinence after radical prostatectomy with adjustable slings or four-arm slings. We collected the number of protections before the procedure and one year after the application of the male sling.
RESULTS: A 4 arms or adjustable sling was put to 65 men. The cure rate was 33.3% (n=5) for Remeex, 52% (n=13) for TOMS, and 46.7% (n=12) for Virtue (P=0.07). The failure rate was 26.7% (n=4) for Remeex, 24% (n=6) for TOMS, and 40% (n=10) for Virtue (P=0.18). The overall complication rate was 40% (n=6) for Remeex, 28% (n=7) for TOMS, and 16% (n=4) for Virtue (P=0.19).
CONCLUSION: This multicentric retrospective series confirms that male slings are a usefull therapy for patients with mild or moderate urinary incontinence.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.