DOI 10.1016/j.jvir.2025.03.015
Transcatheter Arterial Embolization of Vesical Arteries for Intractable Hematuria: Effectiveness and Safety in 36 Patients.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the technical success, safety, and clinical effectiveness of vesical artery and/or internal iliac artery (IIA) embolization in patients with intractable hematuria from bladder hemorrhage.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
A retrospective review was conducted on 36 patients (aged 49-89 years; mean age, 73.9 years) who underwent vesical artery and/or IIA embolization for nontraumatic intractable hematuria between January 2012 and July 2023. The most common etiologies for bleeding were pelvic tumors (n = 20, 55.6%) and radiation cystitis (n = 14, 38.9%). Prior to embolization, 24 patients (66.7%) had undergone cystoscopic intervention. Most patients (n = 29, 80.6%) were hemodynamically stable, while 7 patients (19.4%) were unstable; nearly all (n = 35, 97.2%) required blood transfusions.
RESULTS
Technical success was achieved in 100% of cases. Clinical success was achieved in 30 patients (83.3%), with 6 patients requiring further interventions. Bilateral superselective vesical artery embolization had a higher clinical success rate (90%) than unilateral superselective embolization (70.6%). When bilateral embolization of the vesical arteries and/or IIAs was performed, clinical success was achieved in 94.1% of patients. Additionally, when superselective vesical artery embolization was performed in conjunction with nonselective IIA embolization, clinical success reached 100%. No major adverse events or procedure-related mortality was noted.
CONCLUSIONS
Superselective vesical artery embolization was effective in arresting intractable bladder hematuria, with clinical success further improved by IIA embolization and bilateral embolization.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.