Journal of children's orthopaedics · 2026
Telescopic rods vs. non-telescopic rods in the treatment of osteogenesis imperfecta: A systematic review.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yoshida Rafael, Sombra Matheus Pimentel, Cardoso Michelle de Oliveira, Nogueira Mônica Paschoal
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To compare revision and complication rates between telescopic and non-telescopic intramedullary rods in children with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI).
METHODS: A systematic review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42021287054). Databases were searched up to December 2025. Studies reporting surgical outcomes of intramedullary fixation in OI were included. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models.
RESULTS: Thirty-six studies including 1711 patients and 2459 treated bones were analyzed. Telescopic rods were associated with significantly lower revision rates compared to non-telescopic rods. No significant difference in overall complication rates was observed.
CONCLUSION: Telescopic rods provide improved implant survival and reduce the need for reoperation in growing children with osteogenesis imperfecta, supporting their preferential use in clinical practice.
METHODS: A systematic review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42021287054). Databases were searched up to December 2025. Studies reporting surgical outcomes of intramedullary fixation in OI were included. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models.
RESULTS: Thirty-six studies including 1711 patients and 2459 treated bones were analyzed. Telescopic rods were associated with significantly lower revision rates compared to non-telescopic rods. No significant difference in overall complication rates was observed.
CONCLUSION: Telescopic rods provide improved implant survival and reduce the need for reoperation in growing children with osteogenesis imperfecta, supporting their preferential use in clinical practice.