Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001) · 2024
Factors affecting the accuracy of fetal cardiac ultrasound screening in the first trimester of pregnancy.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hashiramoto Shin, Kaneko Mayumi, Takita Hiroko, Yamashita Yuka, Matsuoka Ryu, Sekizawa Akihiko
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Most studies on the performance of first-trimester cardiac screening have concentrated on comparing the detection rate between different protocols and not on the actual reason for false-negative results. Herein, we report the performance of first-trimester congenital heart disease (CHD) screening and factors that may affect the detection rate of CHDs.
METHODS: This retrospective observational study included patients who underwent first-trimester screening and subsequently gave birth at our facility. We analyzed the performance of first-trimester screening for CHD and major CHD (CHD requiring cardiac surgery or interventional catheterization within 12 months of birth).
RESULTS: Of the 6614 fetuses included, 53 had CHD and 35 had major CHD. For the prenatal diagnosis of CHD, the detection rate, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and first-trimester detection rate for CHD were 64.1%, 99.9%, 94.4%, 99.7%, and 82.9%, respectively; the respective values for major CHD were 85.7%, 99.96%, 93.75%, 99.92%, and 85.7%. The detection rate was not significantly different when classified by crown-rump length or number of fetuses. A weak correlation was observed between low detection rate of major CHD and lower maternal body mass index (BMI) (correlation ratio: 0.17). The detection rate was significantly higher when the fetus was scanned with its spine at the 5-7 o'clock position (posterior spine) than at other positions (odds ratio: 3.82, 95% confidence interval: 1.16-12.5, p = 0.02).
CONCLUSION: Posterior spine contributes to an improved diagnostic rate in first-trimester CHD screening. In addition, sonographers must recognize that low maternal BMI is a risk factor of false-negative results.
METHODS: This retrospective observational study included patients who underwent first-trimester screening and subsequently gave birth at our facility. We analyzed the performance of first-trimester screening for CHD and major CHD (CHD requiring cardiac surgery or interventional catheterization within 12 months of birth).
RESULTS: Of the 6614 fetuses included, 53 had CHD and 35 had major CHD. For the prenatal diagnosis of CHD, the detection rate, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and first-trimester detection rate for CHD were 64.1%, 99.9%, 94.4%, 99.7%, and 82.9%, respectively; the respective values for major CHD were 85.7%, 99.96%, 93.75%, 99.92%, and 85.7%. The detection rate was not significantly different when classified by crown-rump length or number of fetuses. A weak correlation was observed between low detection rate of major CHD and lower maternal body mass index (BMI) (correlation ratio: 0.17). The detection rate was significantly higher when the fetus was scanned with its spine at the 5-7 o'clock position (posterior spine) than at other positions (odds ratio: 3.82, 95% confidence interval: 1.16-12.5, p = 0.02).
CONCLUSION: Posterior spine contributes to an improved diagnostic rate in first-trimester CHD screening. In addition, sonographers must recognize that low maternal BMI is a risk factor of false-negative results.