MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.47895/amp.v58i9.8680

Медицинская библиотека · Acta medica Philippina · 2024

Anesthetic Management of a Patient with Klippel-Feil Syndrome for Laparoscopic Pelvic Surgery: A Case Report.

Chua Criselle C, Cruz Mark Andrew B

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Klippel-Feil Syndrome (KFS) continues to pose significant challenges for anesthesiologists. Beyond the expected complexities of managing difficult airways in these patients, they often present with systemic anomalies that can elevate the risk of morbidity during surgeries conducted under anesthesia. Furthermore, laparoscopic procedures bring about additional physiologic changes that must be taken into consideration when planning the anesthetic care for these individuals. This report details the anesthetic management of a 29-year-old female diagnosed with Klippel-Feil Syndrome (KFS) and concomitant Müllerian duct aplasia-Renal agenesis-Cervicothoracic Somite dysplasia (MURCS) as well as Chiari Type 1 Malformation, who underwent a successful pelvic laparoscopic surgery. The airway was secured through awake fiberoptic-guided intubation while general anesthesia was maintained with a combination of sevoflurane inhalation and remifentanil infusion. Intraoperatively, the team prioritized neuroprotection, lung-protective ventilation strategies, and renal preservation measures. The anesthetic management of patients with KFS necessitates a comprehensive assessment of their anomalies. Incorporating these considerations into the anesthetic management will help mitigate the procedure's adverse effects and lead to favorable patient outcomes.

Для цитирования: Chua Criselle C, Cruz Mark Andrew B. Anesthetic Management of a Patient with Klippel-Feil Syndrome for Laparoscopic Pelvic Surgery: A Case Report.. Acta medica Philippina. 2024. DOI: 10.47895/amp.v58i9.8680.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.