DOI 10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.12.030
Lamellar body count as a predictor of neonatal lung maturity in high-risk pregnancies.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
To compare the usefulness of a lamellar body count, a fluorescence polarization assay, and the foam stability index for predicting neonatal lung maturity in high-risk pregnancies.
SETTING
This study was conducted at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Department of Pediatrics, Assiut University Hospital.
DESIGN
A prospective clinical trail.
SUBJECTS AND
METHODS
This study was performed after recruiting 73 pregnant women, 52 with high-risk pregnancies (25 had diabetes and 27 had premature labor) and 21 with a healthy full-term singleton pregnancy as controls. All women were delivered in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Assiut University Hospital. The newborns with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) were admitted in the neonatal intensive care unit of the Department of Pediatrics. Amniotic fluid specimens were obtained near delivery. Apgar score, vital signs, anthropometric data, and complete clinical examination results were available for all newborns, and particular emphasis was placed on signs of RDS.
RESULTS
The incidence of RDS was 44.2% in the newborns of women who had experienced a high-risk pregnancy (of these, 82.6% were born preterm and 17.4% to diabetic mothers). We found that a lamellar body count is a good screening test for predicting neonatal lung maturity. It is as good as the fetal lung maturity assay by fluorescence polarization in some respects and better in others; moreover, it is better than the foam stability index test in all respects. A lamellar body count with cutoffs of 41 x 10(3)/microL and 18 x 10(3)/microL was a good predictor of low and high risks of RDS in newborns. Values between 19 x 10(3)/microL and 40 x 10(3)/microL were the best to predict an intermediate risk of RDS.
CONCLUSION
Lamellar body count is a good screening test for predicting the degree of neonatal lung maturity.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.