Scandinavian journal of urology · 2018
Quantitative evaluation of the relative apparent diffusion coefficient values on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to predict higher Gleason score prostate cancer.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kato Seiji, Kamijima Shuichi, Inaoka Tsutomu, Kamiya Naoto, Sasai Daisuke, Terada Hitoshi, Hiruta Nobuyuki, Suzuki Hiroyoshi
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) have been reported to correlate with high-Gleason score (GS) prostate cancer. However, the relative ADC values between tumor lesions and normal tissue have been suggested as more suitable than the absolute ADC values for evaluation of diffusion abnormalities, because absolute ADC values are susceptible to differences in scanners or scanner settings. The present study evaluated the usefulness of the relative assessment of ADC values between tumor lesions and normal tissue on preoperative mpMRI for the prediction of high-risk prostate cancer on radical prostatectomy specimens.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 48 men who underwent radical prostatectomy between January 2013 and December 2014 was conducted. MpMRI was performed with a 3.0-T scanner using b-values of 0 and 1500 s/mm2. ADC values of the tumor (ADCTUMOR) and normal prostate and the relative ADC tumor/normal ratio (ADCTNR) were evaluated by two radiologists.
RESULTS: The inter-rater reliability between two radiologists for ADCTUMOR measurement was high, with Pearson's r = 0.982. There was no difference in ADCTUMOR between GS ≤7 and GS ≥8. In contrast, ADCTNR was significantly lower in GS ≥8 than in GS ≤7. ROC curves of ADCTNR to predict higher GS (≥8) showed better classification performance (AUC = 0.8243, p = .0012 by radiologist A and AUC = 0.7961, p = .0031 by radiologist B) than of ADCTUMOR.
CONCLUSIONS: The relative assessment of ADC values between tumor lesions and normal tissue could improve the detection rate of high-risk prostate cancers.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 48 men who underwent radical prostatectomy between January 2013 and December 2014 was conducted. MpMRI was performed with a 3.0-T scanner using b-values of 0 and 1500 s/mm2. ADC values of the tumor (ADCTUMOR) and normal prostate and the relative ADC tumor/normal ratio (ADCTNR) were evaluated by two radiologists.
RESULTS: The inter-rater reliability between two radiologists for ADCTUMOR measurement was high, with Pearson's r = 0.982. There was no difference in ADCTUMOR between GS ≤7 and GS ≥8. In contrast, ADCTNR was significantly lower in GS ≥8 than in GS ≤7. ROC curves of ADCTNR to predict higher GS (≥8) showed better classification performance (AUC = 0.8243, p = .0012 by radiologist A and AUC = 0.7961, p = .0031 by radiologist B) than of ADCTUMOR.
CONCLUSIONS: The relative assessment of ADC values between tumor lesions and normal tissue could improve the detection rate of high-risk prostate cancers.