MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jaip.2025.07.006

Медицинская библиотека · The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2025

The Pragmatic Removal of Penicillin Allergy Electronic Health Record Labels (PROPEL) Trial: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Stone Cosby A, Prigmore Heather L, McCoy Allison B, Stollings Joanna L, Dear Mary Lynn, Hiser William, Van Winkle Grace, Kripalani Sunil, Wright Adam, Harrell Frank E, Rice Todd W, Lindsell Christopher J, Phillips Elizabeth J, Vanderbilt Learning Healthcare System Platform Investigators

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеPragmatic Clinical TrialПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Inaccurate penicillin allergy labels (PALs) affect antimicrobial stewardship, health outcomes, and costs. More than 95% of PALs can be de-labeled when tested, but this rarely happens.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine whether education and an electronic health record (EHR) tool kit to identify low-risk PALs would facilitate inpatient penicillin allergy de-labeling by pharmacists.

METHODS

Pragmatic Removal of Penicillin Allergy Electronic Health Record Labels was a stepped-wedge, nonblinded, randomized, controlled, pragmatic clinical trial including 12 inpatient medical units. From November 2020 to November 2021, units entered intervention at 1-month stepped intervals in random order. Medically stable, nonpregnant adults with an her-documented PAL who were hospitalized on intervention units for 24 hours were included. The intervention included pharmacist and nursing education, a patient list for systematic identification of PALs, presentation of a risk-assessment tool, and an oral amoxicillin challenge order set. The primary outcome was removal of PAL by hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes included safety and implementation measures, longer-term continued label removal, and antibiotic use.

RESULTS

On 12 randomized units, 2,052 patients with a PAL presented during the 1-year trial. More intervention-exposed patients had EHR-documented penicillin allergy removal compared with controls (45 of 1,018 [4.4%] vs 31 of 1,034 [3%], respectively; adjusted odds ratio = 2.05; 95% CI, 1.08-3.91). More intervention-exposed patients received an EHR-documented penicillin allergy risk assessment than did controls (86 of 1,018 [8.4%] vs 27 of 1,034 [2.6%]; adjusted odds ratio = 6.42; 95% CI, 3.08-13.38). Moreover, 27 of 1,018 intervention patients (2.7%) received amoxicillin challenge compared with 21 of 1,034 control patients (2.0%). All amoxicillin challenges were tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Education and deployment of an inpatient EHR tool kit increased the rate of inpatient removal of inaccurate penicillin allergies before discharge.

Для цитирования: Stone Cosby A, Prigmore Heather L, McCoy Allison B, Stollings Joanna L, Dear Mary Lynn, Hiser William, Van Winkle Grace, Kripalani Sunil, Wright Adam, Harrell Frank E, Rice Todd W, Lindsell Christopher J, Phillips Elizabeth J, Vanderbilt Learning Healthcare System Platform Investigators. The Pragmatic Removal of Penicillin Allergy Electronic Health Record Labels (PROPEL) Trial: A Randomized Clinical Trial.. The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2025.07.006.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.