MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3109/09593985.2015.1010244

Медицинская библиотека · Physiotherapy theory and practice · 2015

Differential diagnosis and treatment of bilateral facial pain after whiplash: a case report.

Peterson Seth

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

STUDY

DESIGN

Clinical case report.

BACKGROUND

Symptoms in the face and jaw are common after whiplash. Few studies have reported cervicogenic headache in a trigeminal nerve distribution, and no published studies could be found describing such symptoms experienced bilaterally after whiplash. The objective of the current case report was to detail the clinical reasoning and management of an uncommon patient presentation.

CASE DESCRIPTION: The 41-year-old female patient of the current case complained of shooting pain in the jaw, cheek and forehead beginning 7 days after her accident. No imaging was performed, and examination ruled out serious pathology. The patient was treated primarily with deep neck flexor (DNF) and proprioceptive training for 10 visits over an 8-week period.

OUTCOMES: The Numeric Pain Rating Scale improved from 2/10 to 0/10, the Neck Disability Index improved from 17/50 to 1/50, and the Neck Flexor Muscle Endurance Test improved from 13 to 30 s. The patient remained symptom-free at 4-month follow-up.

DISCUSSION: The current case report describes a patient presentation unique to the literature. Significant changes were seen by week 3 with DNF and proprioceptive training. Additional research is required to determine the effectiveness of this intervention in similar presentations.

Для цитирования: Peterson Seth. Differential diagnosis and treatment of bilateral facial pain after whiplash: a case report.. Physiotherapy theory and practice. 2015. DOI: 10.3109/09593985.2015.1010244.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.