DOI 10.1016/j.ajur.2019.03.003
Does endoscopic sclerotherapy in filarial chyluria affect renal function and morphology? A prospective study using dimercaptosuccinic acid renal scan.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To look for change in relative renal function and document renal scarring following endoscopic renal pelvic instillation sclerotherapy (RPIS) in patients with chyluria by dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) renal scan.
METHODS
A prospective study was performed between November 2015 and September 2016. All patients with biochemically documented chyluria who underwent RPIS using either 1%-silver nitrate or 0.1%-povidine iodine were included. Patients received either 3-, 6- or 9-doses. DMSA renal scan was performed before and 2-3 months after sclerotherapy.
RESULTS
Of the 34 patients, 22 were males. Mean age was 41.08 ± 16.64 years (range, 15-70 years). Thirty-two patients (94.1%) responded to therapy while two did not respond even after 9-doses. Average follow-up was 8.94 ± 3.70 months. The mean relative renal function (pre-instillation) of normal kidney was 50.76% ± 3.55% while that of affected renal unit (side of instillation) was 49.20% ± 3.44% (range, 43.0%-61.0%). After instillation therapy, the mean relative renal function of normal side was 52.26% ± 3.57% while that of affected renal unit was 47.50% ± 3.56% (range, 41.0%-54.0%). The relative renal function did not change >5% from the baseline value in any patient except one (in which the differential function increased paradoxically by 12%). Two patients developed renal scar in post-instillation renal scan.
CONCLUSION
Endoscopic sclerotherapy in chyluria is safe and effective. The relative renal function does not deteriorate by more than 5%. There is a small risk of development of renal scar. More studies involving larger number of patients are needed to answer this dilemma.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.