DOI 10.1097/spv.0000000000001801
The Association of Nocturia and Major Cardiovascular Events: A Bayesian Analysis.
Аннотация
IMPORTANCE
Mixed evidence suggests that nocturia may be related to major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs).
OBJECTIVES
Our objective was to estimate the association between nocturia, quantified on bladder diaries, and MACE.
STUDY
DESIGN
From 2021 to 2024, the Symptoms of Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction Research Network observational study (LURN II) enrolled participants with or without nocturia. Baseline characteristics, patient-reported outcomes, and bladder diary data were collected and joined with MACE outcomes from the electronic medical records at a single site. Participants with a diagnosis of a MACE outcome before LURN II enrollment were excluded. Estimates of the associations between the number of nocturia events, nocturia volumes, and the proportion of daily urine made at night, or nocturnal polyuria index (NPI), and ranked MACE outcomes were generated. Associations were estimated using Bayesian proportional odds ordinal models with skeptical priors. Model covariates included age and sex.
RESULTS
Of the 146 participants, 10.3% developed a MACE. Median follow-up time (IQR) was 31.5 (18.7) months. The probability of an association between NPI and MACE outcomes was 98% (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.01; credible interval, 1.00, 1.02). The probability of an association between the number of nocturia episodes and MACE was 84% (aOR, 1.09; credible interval, 0.93, 1.29). The probability of an association between NPI with male sex and MACEs was 0.98, and with female sex and MACEs was 0.00005 (aOR, 1.01; 95% credible interval, 1.00, 1.02).
CONCLUSION
NPI, especially in males, and the number of nocturia episodes have a high probability of being associated with MACE outcomes.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.