Frontiers in oncology · 2026
Short-term mortality after intensive care admission in acute lymphoblastic versus predominantly acute myeloid leukemia: a retrospective cohort study using MIMIC-IV with eICU external replication.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Li Zhe, Yu Jianglin
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Adults with acute leukemia admitted to intensive care have high early mortality. Whether acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) adds prognostic information beyond baseline severity remains clinically important.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective MIMIC-IV cohort study of 486 first ICU stays from 372 adults with acute leukemia. Primary outcomes were hospital and ICU mortality. ALL was compared with a predominantly acute myeloid leukemia comparator using complementary confounder-only and severity-adjusted models and ICD-derived remission stratification, with directional replication in an independent eICU cohort.
RESULTS: ALL admissions were younger and less severely ill at ICU entry. Crude hospital mortality was lower in ALL than in the predominantly AML comparator (23.8% vs. 38.6%; P = 0.010). After adjustment for age and comorbidity alone, ALL showed a non-significant reduction in the odds of hospital mortality (adjusted OR, 0.688; 95% CI, 0.385-1.228). Adding first-day Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), which partly overlaps with leukemia-related complications, moved this estimate toward the null (adjusted OR, 0.905; 95% CI, 0.485-1.689). ICU-mortality estimates were also non-significant, although the severity-adjusted ICU estimate crossed the null (confounder-only adjusted OR, 0.690; severity-adjusted OR, 1.076). Because first-day SOFA may lie on the subtype-to-outcome pathway, the confounder-only estimate is reported as the total-association estimate (not conditional on the possible mediator), and all confidence intervals remained wide. Model calibration and discrimination were acceptable. In an independent eICU cohort (n=82), the crude and severity-adjusted ALL estimates for hospital mortality (odds ratios 0.667 and 0.445) were likewise non-significant.
CONCLUSION: In MIMIC-IV, the crude ALL survival advantage narrowed after adjustment and was not statistically significant. In eICU, crude and severity-adjusted estimates were likewise non-significant but moved further from, rather than toward, the null. Wide confidence intervals in both cohorts, the small ALL sample, overlap between first-day SOFA and leukemia-related complications, and unmeasured leukemia-specific factors leave a modest residual subtype effect possible. These are within-ICU associations affected by selection into intensive care; incomplete post-discharge death ascertainment mainly limits longer-horizon interpretation.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective MIMIC-IV cohort study of 486 first ICU stays from 372 adults with acute leukemia. Primary outcomes were hospital and ICU mortality. ALL was compared with a predominantly acute myeloid leukemia comparator using complementary confounder-only and severity-adjusted models and ICD-derived remission stratification, with directional replication in an independent eICU cohort.
RESULTS: ALL admissions were younger and less severely ill at ICU entry. Crude hospital mortality was lower in ALL than in the predominantly AML comparator (23.8% vs. 38.6%; P = 0.010). After adjustment for age and comorbidity alone, ALL showed a non-significant reduction in the odds of hospital mortality (adjusted OR, 0.688; 95% CI, 0.385-1.228). Adding first-day Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), which partly overlaps with leukemia-related complications, moved this estimate toward the null (adjusted OR, 0.905; 95% CI, 0.485-1.689). ICU-mortality estimates were also non-significant, although the severity-adjusted ICU estimate crossed the null (confounder-only adjusted OR, 0.690; severity-adjusted OR, 1.076). Because first-day SOFA may lie on the subtype-to-outcome pathway, the confounder-only estimate is reported as the total-association estimate (not conditional on the possible mediator), and all confidence intervals remained wide. Model calibration and discrimination were acceptable. In an independent eICU cohort (n=82), the crude and severity-adjusted ALL estimates for hospital mortality (odds ratios 0.667 and 0.445) were likewise non-significant.
CONCLUSION: In MIMIC-IV, the crude ALL survival advantage narrowed after adjustment and was not statistically significant. In eICU, crude and severity-adjusted estimates were likewise non-significant but moved further from, rather than toward, the null. Wide confidence intervals in both cohorts, the small ALL sample, overlap between first-day SOFA and leukemia-related complications, and unmeasured leukemia-specific factors leave a modest residual subtype effect possible. These are within-ICU associations affected by selection into intensive care; incomplete post-discharge death ascertainment mainly limits longer-horizon interpretation.