DOI 10.1016/j.jgar.2019.05.013
Measurement and prediction of antimicrobial resistance in bloodstream infections by ESKAPE pathogens and Escherichia coli.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
This study aimed to evaluate a cumulative antimicrobial resistance index (ARI) as a possible key outcome measure of antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASPs) and a tool to predict the antimicrobial resistance (AMR) trend.
METHODS
Antimicrobial susceptibility for Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacter spp. and Escherichia coli (ESKAPEEc) pathogens recovered from blood cultures during a 5-year period (2014-2018) was analysed to obtain a cumulative ARI. For each antibiotic tested, a score of 0, 0.5 or 1 was assigned for susceptibility, intermediate resistance or resistance, respectively, and the ARI was calculated by dividing the sum of these scores by the number of antibiotics tested. Cumulative ARIs of ESKAPEEc micro-organisms were compared and a mathematical prediction model for AMR trend was obtained.
RESULTS
In total, 1858 ESKAPEEc isolates were included in the study. The cumulative ESKAPEEc mean ARI increased significantly from 0.200 ± 0.01 in 2014 to 0.276 ± 0.02 in 2018 (P < 0.001). In multivariable regression analysis, factors significantly associated with ARI ≥ 0.5 were E. faecium, K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii infection (P < 0.001) and infection occurring after 2014 (P < 0.05). Based on the prediction model obtained, in the absence of any interventional measure, a tendency to pandrug resistance of the ESKAPEEc group could be expected in the next 8-15 years.
CONCLUSION
The ARI could be a useful tool to measure the impact of ASPs on AMR. The increasing incidence of AMR among ESKAPEEc organisms underscores the needing for ASPs.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.