MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/wnp.0000000000000373

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society · 2017

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Grading Using High-Resolution Ultrasonography.

El Habashy Hala R, El Hadidy Reem A, Ahmed Sandra M, El Sayed Basma B, Ahmed Aya S

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a common entrapment neuropathy of the wrist. The diagnosis of CTS has been a concern for physicians for a long time. The aim of this study is to evaluate the use of the median nerve (MN) cross-sectional area (CSA) in the wrist compared with the CSA in the forearm to grade the severity of CTS in Egyptian patients.

METHODS

The CSAs of the MN in the wrist and forearm were measured in 72 wrists that were diagnosed with CTS via nerve conduction studies and 80 healthy wrists. The CTS group was subdivided into three subgroups (mild, moderate, and severe CTS). The ratio of the CSA of the MN in the wrist to that in the forearm was used to calculate cutoff values for CTS grading.

RESULTS

There were positive correlations between the CSAs of the MN in the wrist and MN conduction latency. At a wrist-forearm ratio of 1.7, the high-resolution ultrasonography showed 96.1% accuracy in the detection of CTS.

CONCLUSIONS

High-resolution ultrasonography can be used in CTS grading.

Для цитирования: El Habashy Hala R, El Hadidy Reem A, Ahmed Sandra M, El Sayed Basma B, Ahmed Aya S. Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Grading Using High-Resolution Ultrasonography.. Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society. 2017. DOI: 10.1097/wnp.0000000000000373.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.