Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2024
Detection of hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes through breath volatile organic compound profiling using gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nicolier Cléo, Künzler Juri, Lizoain Aritz, Kerber Daniel, Hossmann Stefanie, Rothenbühler Martina, Laimer Markus, Witthauer Lilian
Аннотация
AIM: To evaluate the relationship between breath volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and glycaemic states in individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D), focusing on identifying specific VOCs as biomarkers for hypoglycaemia to offer a non-invasive diabetes-monitoring method.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten individuals with T1D underwent induced hypoglycaemia in a clinical setting. Breath samples, collected every 10-15 minutes, were analysed using gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry (GC-IMS). Correlation analysis and machine learning models, including Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA) and Support Vector Machine classifiers, were used to classify glycaemic states based on VOC profiles.
RESULTS: Statistical analysis revealed moderate correlations between specific VOCs (e.g. isoprene, acetone) and venous blood glucose levels. Machine learning models showed high accuracy in classifying glycaemic states, with the best performance achieved by a two-class PLS-DA model showing an accuracy of 93%, sensitivity of 92% and specificity of 94%. Key biomarkers identified included isoprene, acetone, 2-butanone, methanol, ethanol, 2-propanol and 2-pentanone.
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the potential of breath VOCs to accurately classify glycaemic states in individuals with T1D. While key biomarkers such as isoprene, acetone and 2-butanone were identified, the analysis emphasizes the importance of using overall VOC patterns rather than individual compounds, which can be markers for multiple conditions. Machine learning models leveraging these patterns achieved high accuracy, sensitivity and specificity. These findings suggest that breath analysis using GC-IMS could be a viable non-invasive method for monitoring glycaemic states and managing diabetes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten individuals with T1D underwent induced hypoglycaemia in a clinical setting. Breath samples, collected every 10-15 minutes, were analysed using gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry (GC-IMS). Correlation analysis and machine learning models, including Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA) and Support Vector Machine classifiers, were used to classify glycaemic states based on VOC profiles.
RESULTS: Statistical analysis revealed moderate correlations between specific VOCs (e.g. isoprene, acetone) and venous blood glucose levels. Machine learning models showed high accuracy in classifying glycaemic states, with the best performance achieved by a two-class PLS-DA model showing an accuracy of 93%, sensitivity of 92% and specificity of 94%. Key biomarkers identified included isoprene, acetone, 2-butanone, methanol, ethanol, 2-propanol and 2-pentanone.
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the potential of breath VOCs to accurately classify glycaemic states in individuals with T1D. While key biomarkers such as isoprene, acetone and 2-butanone were identified, the analysis emphasizes the importance of using overall VOC patterns rather than individual compounds, which can be markers for multiple conditions. Machine learning models leveraging these patterns achieved high accuracy, sensitivity and specificity. These findings suggest that breath analysis using GC-IMS could be a viable non-invasive method for monitoring glycaemic states and managing diabetes.