MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · The Israel Medical Association journal : IMAJ · 2015

Type I-II laryngeal cleft: clinical course and outcome.

Slonimsky Guy, Carmel Eldar, Drendel Michael, Lipschitz Noga, Wolf Michael

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Laryngeal cleft (LC) is a rare congenital anomaly manifesting in a variety of symptoms, including swallowing disorders and aspirations, dyspnea, stridor and hoarseness. The mild forms (types I-II) may be underdiagnosed, leading to protracted symptomatology and morbidity.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the diagnostic process, clinical course, management and outcome in children with type I-II laryngeal clefts.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective case analysis for the years 2005-2012 in a tertiary referral center.

RESULTS

Seven children were reviewed: five boys and two girls ranging in age from birth to 5 years. The most common presenting symptoms were cough, aspirations and pneumonia. Evaluation procedures included fiber-optic laryngoscopy (FOL), direct laryngoscopy (DL) and videofluoroscopy. Other pathologies were seen in three children. Six children underwent successful endoscopic surgery and one child was treated conservatively. The postoperative clinical course was uneventful in most of the cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Types I-II LC should be considered in the differential diagnosis of children presenting with protracted cough and aspirations. DL is crucial for establishing the diagnosis. Endoscopic surgery is safe and should be applied promptly when conservative measures fail.

Для цитирования: Slonimsky Guy, Carmel Eldar, Drendel Michael, Lipschitz Noga, Wolf Michael. Type I-II laryngeal cleft: clinical course and outcome.. The Israel Medical Association journal : IMAJ. 2015.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.