MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jpurol.2010.01.017

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of pediatric urology · 2010

Surgical treatment of penile duplication.

de Oliveira Manuel Castanheira, Ramires Ricardo, Soares José, Carvalho António Pedro, Marcelo Filinto

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Penile duplication is a rare anomaly with an incidence of 1 in 5,500,000. It is normally associated with other malformations, such as double bladder, presence of the cloaca, imperforate anus, duplication of the rectosigmoid and vertebral deformities. Presented here is the surgical technique used to resolve a rare case of complete penile duplication in a 5-year-old child, without any other malformation.

PATIENT AND

METHODS

A male Caucasian patient presented with a rare diagnosis of complete penile duplication, without any associated systemic malformation. At 5 years of age, he was successfully submitted to surgical treatment. The procedure included the following steps: penile dissection up to the point of ischial-pubic insertion; dissection of the hypoplastic urethra; amputation of the less developed penis; termino-lateral urethral anastomosis and phalloplasty.

RESULTS

Three years after surgery, penile morphology was normal, with a normal urinary flow according to age.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment should always be individualized. The malformations that are potentially life-threatening should be solved first. Fortunately, this patient had only penile duplication, successfully corrected after surgical treatment.

Для цитирования: de Oliveira Manuel Castanheira, Ramires Ricardo, Soares José, Carvalho António Pedro, Marcelo Filinto. Surgical treatment of penile duplication.. Journal of pediatric urology. 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2010.01.017.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.