MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1996.tb00696.x

Медицинская библиотека · The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery · 1996

The surgical treatment of brachial plexus injuries.

Tonkin M A, Eckersley J R, Gschwind C R

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Brachial plexus injuries cause a devastating loss of function in the arm. The aim of this study was to review the results of surgical treatment of patients with brachial plexus injuries.

METHODS

Forty-seven patients were reviewed. Five patients did not undergo surgery. Forty-two patients had exploration and 38 had primary surgery with neurolysis, nerve graft or neurotization or a combination. Four patients had other reconstructive surgery primarily. Secondary reconstructive surgery consisted of joint fusions and tendon transfers to enhance or replace the primary surgery.

RESULTS

Nerve grafting achieved 62% Medical Research Council (MRC) grade M3 or better. Intercostal neurotization (ICN) of the musculocutaneous nerve (MCN) for elbow flexion achieved M3 or better in 69% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary nerve reconstruction, combined with joint fusions and tendon transfers, provides a worthwhile return of function to many patients. We advise early exploration (i.e. within 2 weeks when possible) for patients with complete C5-T1 lesions or C5,6,7 lesions in conjunction with high energy injuries. In order to obtain optimal results patients with brachial plexus injuries should be referred to appropriate units as early as possible.

Для цитирования: Tonkin M A, Eckersley J R, Gschwind C R. The surgical treatment of brachial plexus injuries.. The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery. 1996. DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1996.tb00696.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.